2007-03-04 08:59:45 · 15 answers · asked by FOX NEWS WATCHER 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No.
2007-03-04 09:02:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. That's one of the great things about this country is that we have freedom of the press. I think if we had one news source people would think we are trying to brainwash them or something.
2007-03-04 17:34:55 · answer #2 · answered by Gabs 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course not. They should track multiple on line news sites as well as multiple cable television news sources, just like I do...Notice I did not recommend the pop bottom three.
2007-03-04 17:06:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Me. Just kidding. We should have as many sources as possible. But as soon as one is found lying or inventing their sources it should be a criminal offense. Jayson Blair should be in prison, not doing interviews and writing a book.
2007-03-04 17:10:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, different points of view are essential, unless you are trying to brainwash the populous. What if that one news source became corrupt? Who would keep them in check?
2007-03-04 17:04:49 · answer #5 · answered by iccelou91 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Like China does? Some Fox News watcher YOU are.
2007-03-04 17:02:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Meh, why not? They all report the same crap--Anna Nicole and Britney Spears.
2007-03-04 17:03:49 · answer #7 · answered by wrathinif 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
With all the American nations around that would be impossible. Which American nation would decide what we see? Venezuela? uncool.
2007-03-04 17:02:30 · answer #8 · answered by r1b1c* 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, and it should be msnbc, that way we know for sure we can not trust the media.
2007-03-04 17:03:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
yes, homeland security news hour.
2007-03-04 17:10:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, but they really should dump Fox News...
2007-03-04 17:02:45 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋