Basically its Pujols for berkman because pedro is hurt and along with roger who isn't even going to play. i would much rather have pujols. hope this helps.
2007-03-04 08:49:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by jcenathuganomics 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would go for neither because Albert Pujols is a great bat. Dont get me wrong, Lance Berkman is excellent too but Pedro might not be back til lste June early July and Roger Clemens might not even come back and if he does it will probably be in June also.
2007-03-04 08:57:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by tommy v 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, thats an old fantasy scam, trying to ship off 2 good players for the number 1 guy, never fall for that, unless you are getting Berkman and a younger pitcher who is not coming off injury and is'nt old. NO no No trading Pujols
2007-03-04 08:51:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
terrible trade, Pujols is the best fantasy player in the game. Pedro is hurt, and Clemens has alraedy said he didn't want to pitch for a whole season. He'll most likely join a team in the middle of the year.
2007-03-04 09:11:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by RDubs 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are getting Pujols and someone offers you this, take it and beg the rest of the managers not to veto the trade.
If you have Pujols, this is a terrible trade and if someone offered it to you - drive to their house and smack them for insulting you.
2007-03-04 09:23:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by EnormusJ69 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
somewhat no longer, the deal has some skills yet you're giving up the main, Mauer will possibly no longer play an entire season, Granderson is a springing up proficient athlete, Grady is a great participant, yet you're giving as much as lots
2016-12-18 15:17:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
i think thats a very bad trade!!!
2007-03-04 08:59:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by BOSTON CELTICS 3
·
0⤊
0⤋