That'll be a no. If anything it's the other way around:
PAY ATTENTION:
Nash with Dallas
In 03: 17.7 ppg, 7.3 apg, 46.5 FG%
In 04: 14.5 ppg, 8.8apg, 47.0 FG%
Nash with Suns
In 05: 15.5 ppg, 11.5 apg, 50.2 FG%
In 06: 18.9 ppg, 10.5 apg, 51.2 FG%
Marion before Nash:
In 01: 17.3 ppg, 10.7 rpg, 48FG%(double double)
In 03: 21.2 ppg, 9.5 rpg, 45.2FG%(An all-star & playoffs)
In 04: 19.0 ppg, 9.3 rpg, 44.0FG%
Marion with Nash:
In 05: 19.4 ppg, 11.3 rpg, 47.6FG%(In 01 it was higher)
In 06: 21.8 ppg, 11.8 rpg, 52.5FG%
In 07 his fg is back to 47.7FG%
You can clearly see who numbers got better when they came together. Nash's assist went up, his FG% went up, points went up, & he never averaged a double double until he was a Sun. Before Nash, Marion averaged a double double, was an all-star, and been in the playoffs. As you can see, Marion with or without Nash numbers goes up and down. Nash haven't made a difference with Marion's game. Marion's is his OWN star.
Any questions?
2007-03-04
08:05:13
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Sports
➔ Basketball
Take note: If you take any key player from any lineup the team is going to struggle. Since a team loses more games without a certain player doesn't mean that player is the best player on the team or that certain player makes a team better. If you take Marion from the Suns they'll be missing someone who averages a double double in rebounds & points. The Suns would most definitley struggle without Marion. Who's going to make up for all them double digit rebounds & double digit points?
2007-03-04
08:11:48 ·
update #1