English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Okay ,so that supports the plane theory.But by the same token we have many eyewitnesses in WTC who heard ,felt, were thrown by and injured by explosions in the subbasement of WTC.Including firemen and policemen
sO HOW IS IT THAT we are expected to accept the Pentagon eyewitnesses and yet discount and ignore the WTC witnesses?

2007-03-04 06:58:52 · 2 answers · asked by Paul I 4 in Politics & Government Government

leogirl.The elevator shafts were not connected.Broken up at the sky lobby.I am talking about the sight and sound of numerous explosions by scores of witnesses many who were burned and injured and flashes consistent with explosions independently and collectively corraborated by emergency personnel on the scene

2007-03-04 07:08:46 · update #1

these are things that occurred in the subbasement and on other floors such as floor 8 where numerous esplosions were heard by firemen.The lobby was completely blown out .This can be seen on the Naudet video

2007-03-04 07:11:31 · update #2

2 answers

Hi I`am sure there are a lot of stories out there of what hit the pentagon.What i saw on news reel looked to me as a fast cylinder shape blur slamming into the outer building.For a plane that had all that jet fuel in it there was not that much flame spread about.I also did not see a lot of the plane`s wreckage at the scene,tail ,wings etc.To me i saw missile hitting the Pentagon.

2007-03-04 07:23:39 · answer #1 · answered by rosco 6 · 0 0

don't you think that hitting the structure would have cause explosion like sounds, or more logically the noise sound waves coming down the elevator shafts and bouncing off the bottom and making it appear that it was from down below.

2007-03-04 07:03:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers