Is it time to consider term limits or possible age limits in Congress. Both sides of the aisle have had some people who are really shouldn't be there. Strom Thurman was 100 when he left the Senate. Robert Byrd is sounding more and more like someone with dementia every day.
This is not a partisan question. Both sides are guilty.
2007-03-04 05:52:24 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I would agree with term limits on every elected office. The original intent was to serve the public, not to use it to consolidate your power and line your pockets.
2007-03-04 05:58:03 · answer #1 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is long over due to for term limits in Congress.
2007-03-04 13:55:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It should have been done a long time ago. Robert Byrd is senile, Kennedy is never present at votes, etc, etc...
Time to limit their gravy train.
2007-03-04 13:58:19 · answer #3 · answered by aattaacckk 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would agree with term limits
2007-03-05 00:04:17 · answer #4 · answered by joymlcat 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is WAY PAST time for term limits.
The guys who are in there for so many years get bought and paid for by special interest groups and that is hurting all of us.
2007-03-04 13:58:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree
2007-03-04 13:56:39 · answer #6 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
if the office of the president is, congress sure as hell should be!
2007-03-04 14:06:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋