If they showed the world close up video's theyd be in big trouble lol And only in america would a plane hit and cause tiny damage when its clear what hit the pentagon...That place would be swamped with security videos... Look at buildin number 7 it fell on its own.... go figure (maybe a UFO hit it)?
They needed a war and they needed to create one = Results of the current events and more excuses to come ...
2007-03-04 05:25:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
well the plane parts argument is pretty sketchy.That big piece of fuselage.I really tried to match it to a commercial plane and it just didnt match anything.Others have done this too .
The video frames ........that white thing is not a commercial airplane.
I cant ignore the eyewitness accounts.However they are conflicting as well.Some say they saw a plane ..some a small plane and some nothing that looked like a plane.
No seats in the wreckage(what wreckage) and even Rumsfeld admitted by acident that it was a missile.
And so on and so forth.Conclusuion???? Something is being concealed
Whats intereesting is if we are to accept the eyewitness accounts that say they saw a plane ,then we have to look at the eyewitnesses that heard ,saw and were injured by explosions in the subbasement of WTC.I mean you cant have it both ways
2007-03-04 13:52:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Paul I 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are about 350-400 extant eye witness accounts of a plane flying into the Pentaon, and if you google "Pentagon plane wreckage" you will find plenty of pictures.
What is your motivation for perpetuating this nonsense? If you really believe their is some kind of conspiracy, have you NO fear that an agency powerful to do that knows who you are & where you are & will come after you if you make them mad?
Makes no sense to me why you would invite such wrath!
2007-03-04 13:29:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
There is plenty of surveillance footage.
The question a person should ask is why are we only permitted to see the five shots from the parking lot where the explosion is perfectly visible, but the object actually impacting the Pentagon is obscured?
There were cameras all over the place that morning, and tape from several of them (if it still exists) absolutely shows what happened.
2007-03-04 13:23:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by oimwoomwio 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
You've been reading too many of those conspericy sites.
#1 Aluminum plane intense heat melted aliminum.
#2 You answered it yourself. It's one of the most well protected building and they aren't going to release footage of it so yahoos can make up new dumb conspericies about it.
#3 My brother watch the whole thing and I'll believe my brither over your piss poor conspericies any time.
You do know the word conspericy is just another word for lie dont you?
2007-03-04 13:30:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kevin A 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Discovery Channel and /or History Channel had programs devoted to Pentagon attack, with all the points addressed. Pay attention. You can order copies of the programs.
2007-03-04 13:26:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by John H 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
there is no conspiracy. there is no need for one. the us and uk went to iraq for no reason and never really claimed to have a reason.
think about why you are so insistant that there was a cover up?
the footage was really too fast to make out what it was. i remember two eyewitness accounts and i think the no wreckage is a myth.
2007-03-04 13:24:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by splinter 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
This question along with Y did Building 7 Fall Down are good questions, the Government seems to Ignore.......
2007-03-04 13:26:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by bodie 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
a simple search will give you pictures of the debris , including landing gear and engines
or are you internet challenged?
2007-03-04 13:21:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by chumpchange 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
There is no fooling you. They faked the moon landing too.
Pass the Kool Aid.
2007-03-04 13:29:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by C B 6
·
1⤊
2⤋