life begins at conception , without a doubt , technology has proven that . a woman isnt told to get pregnant , so therefore making abortion illegal will not take any rights away from the woman . rape and incest is different .
2007-03-04 05:05:48 · 13 answers · asked by kramer 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
It's not murder, it's a choice. Every human deserves the right to choose what happens to their own body.
2007-03-04 05:53:28 · answer #1 · answered by 4:20 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Of course you are wrong, technology has never created life and therefore does not know when life begins. Only a liar would claim otherwise.
Technology tells us that the fetus is not a baby. Technology says that a baby can live outside the mothers womb with the help of other humans outside the womb. A fetus is not a Baby according to technology. A fetus cannot live outside the womb even though it has a heart that is beating, a brain that is functioning and is on life support. A fetus on life support is not the same as a baby on life support. A baby on life support has fully functioning organs, a fetus does not have those organs. So you are simply a fool that has believed a line of Bull fed to you by other fools.
Each fetus you "save" through technology cost hundreds of thousands of dollars or perhaps millions of dollars. Those same dollars could have been used to save hundreds of normal babies with medical needs. So when you "save" one you are a murderer of hundreds. Most pro life and pro choice people understand this and will laugh at your foolish statements. We know that God produced some , like you, with the minds of babes and we know that God loves you, but please stop killing these loved babies and saving unwanted fetuses.
Mi---H
the key word is "technology". and technology is expensive---
---don't try to figure this out--- it is beyond you.
2007-03-04 15:20:20 · answer #2 · answered by Give me Liberty 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's still only opinion. Technology hasn't proven that life begins at conception. Whether or not it's murder is solely based on opinion.
making abortion illegal will not take any rights away from the woman
-Yes it will, it will infringe on their reproductive rights.
rape and incest is different.
-If abortion is always murder, who are you to decide on what exceptions there can be?
2007-03-04 06:26:39 · answer #3 · answered by Liberals love America! 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Because pregnancy isn't attached to an on/off switch and there are many social pressures that encourage women not to have children.
Because of the above women will have abortion legally or illegally. The legality makes no difference on the topic of abortion. It will happen anyway.
2007-03-04 11:44:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
because both way you inspect it someone is deliberately killed on the fingers of yet another. The time period homicide is only a note. operating example, if someone were to strike a pregnant women people contained in the tummy and the toddler dies, that man or woman will be charged with homicide. Now if a similar women people were given an abortion, all will be legally advantageous even although the toddler is merely as lifeless on the fingers of yet another. Why is it a human in a unmarried case with each and each of the rights of a human and only a "fetus" with out accurate to existence the subsequent. Obama become accurate, it really is one challenge that people will stay sharply divided on. no man or woman will convince the different part that their position is sweet. Tim: As yet another poster already stated, abortion become criminal and typically forced in Nazi Germany. Your Hitler analogy is way off base and easily hurts your reason. professional-lifers desire to shield existence, Hitler and the Nazis chosen to end existence via the thousands and thousands. Who else ends existence via the thousands and thousands? Abortion medical doctors. it truly is why the pro-existence circulate is antagonistic to abortion(homicide). It ends lives via the thousands and thousands in line with annum. regrettably each crew has their nut jobs that take issues to the acute. a lot so that they extremely bypass antagonistic to what they were taught. homicide is faulty in spite of who does it and what their motives are be it funds(Tiller) or some psychological case (Tiller's assassin). i think their were extra significant different and toddlers terrorists acts via the left then on the right for the length of the merely accurate fifty+ years in united statesa.. Hater Police: you need to no longer have suggested it better to tutor my element. ONE in our ranks of thousands and thousands is a assassin. ONE! thanks.
2016-11-27 20:57:39 · answer #5 · answered by guarnieri 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HA! You are funny!
Unless you have a uterus, you have no say in the matter.
Abortion is a choice that ONLY the pregnant woman can make.
And, no, life doesn't begin at conception.......your knowledge of the reproductive process is lacking in soooo many way.
2007-03-04 07:31:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
How is this an elections question? This is a question about law.
To answer the question: abortion is legal because the supreme court upheld it in Roe v. Wade.
2007-03-04 05:56:58 · answer #7 · answered by Babu Chicorico 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
"Give me liberty" is a fool.. No a fetus can not live without the support of the mother, but NO child can... please cite your source sir, where each child saved form abortion cost millions!? surely you are not proposing that we run a cost benefit analysis on Human Life..If so how much is a life worth to you Sir!?
2007-03-05 11:56:16 · answer #8 · answered by michael H 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Libs think the fetus is disposable like a diaper. That's why. Fecal matter and fetus is the same to them.
2007-03-04 05:39:54 · answer #9 · answered by count_bongula666 3 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Don't know. Some people just don't want to face reality.
2007-03-05 14:59:47 · answer #10 · answered by plebes02 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋