TNA or WWE?

Question

I want to know which company you prefer and why, I really don't want to hear (company) sucks I want a number good and I do mean good reasons thank you those who will follow and the most convincing on will be picked best answer.

Answer 1

Ok without a dought TNA is better for wrestling there athletites are second to none. The WWE care more about big guys who or people who can work the mic.

I like both but WWE are more acters than wrestlers due to vince. Vince would rather have a big guy who looks the part but cant wrestle. Than a small guy who can wrestle. Also if you have good mic skills vince will have you.

TNA would pick the good wrestler over the big guy or mic speaker anyday. So its all down to your fancy the Wrestling side or the sports entertainment side.

Its a fine line and i do prefere the WWE because ive watched it all my life. But if i was new to the wrestling world i would much rather watch TNA as it is more wrestling and applies to a 18+ fan base. The WWE want a family fan base.

Hope this helps ya dude :)

Answer 2

TNA might have the best technical skills but WWE have the funds & backing to have the stories & angles & feuds.Vince has the $$ to put on a good show that has entertainment as well eg the Battle of the Billionaires.He has a bigger roster to pick & choose for the 3 brands.
TNA is an independent outfit that stays in Florida.Dixie Carter doesn't have the same backing or tv exposure so they concentrate on the pure wrestling aspect.For sure they have storylines between stars but not on such a big scale.
I watch TNA & like it but there's an almost amateur feel to it.I like Abyss & Styles & Samoa Joe, but that's it basically.On WWE you have the big draws, the legends the heroes who entertain & wrestle eg Taker, DX, Kane.WWE always will be the guys for me.

Answer 3

I still prefer WWE because I like all the stupid plotlines they have going on even though some of them are rehashes of old ideas. Vince McMahon is one smart cookie but he has no need to be fearful just yet. TNA has a long way to go before it's in the same league as WWE i.m.o. The one good thing TNA does have going for it is the way the roster works it's *** off some of the younger guys (Senshi, Petey Williams,Eric Young and Chris Sabin) to name a few are incredible athletes I actually believe that once TNA gets a permanent 2hour TV slot every week and they are able to contract the roster instead of this whole per appearance basis then they may be able to realistically compete with WWE just like WCW were during the "Monday Night Wars".

Answer 4

wwe.

tna has some good matches and good ppv's but the storylines are so weak. there are only 2 titles and 90% of the roster is washed up wwe superstars and none of the wrestlers have any mike skillz (cristan and double j excluded). although tna's "x division" is sick, there heavyweight division totaly sucks i mean look at the champs: christian, rhyno ... they weren't anywhere close to main eventers in the wwe. i will give props to aj styles, sonjay dutt, sabin and the rest of the x division however (not countin samoa joe) as they are about the only talent on tna. plus the divas on tna are usless and few and far between and

wwe on the other has a massive roster featuring most of the best that the world has to offer. the ppv's are generally good and although the matches are going downhill a bit they are still thouroghly enjoyable to watch. wwe has a number of titles and a womens division featuring divas that look good and can actually wrestle e.g. micky james, candice, melina... the wwe has a sick heavyweight division with the likes of kane, undertaker, hhh, shawn micheals... and main eventers waiting to break through such as matt and jeff hardy, cm punk... as well as a great cruiserweight division: gregory helms, jimmy yang ... also wwe superstars tend to have reasonably good mike skillz e.g. shawn micheals, ric flair... and the storylines are not always all that good but are still above par compared to tna's. wwe also created some of the best matches known to man like the ladder, hell in the cell, tlc and elimination chamer matches amoung many others.

Answer 5

TNA is just a good sidetrack from WWE. It is what you watch if you Like wrestling alot and see some innovative matches. WWE will Rule for a while though cause it uses better Wrestlers as a rule. (Can be Debated as far as Umaga and Cena are concerned). The Better Storylines. And it is on longer than one Hour on Mondays and Fridays. (I will never watch ECW. I would love to see it go under again)

Answer 6

WWE because TNA Sucks

Answer 7

In my opinion wwe is better i think this because for one i think it has better wrestlers like Undertaker,batista, cena, Shawn micheals, rany orton, edge, boogeman, finley,matt hardy, umaga,and other stars like eddie guerro, rey mysterio, jeff hardy , lashley who been there
and tna doesnt really have any really famous wrestlers although it has more concepts like elevation "X" thats what i think

Answer 8

ok wwe is the original wrestling on TV and they have the best wrestlers.
Tna has less great wrestlers bus their is less storyline and its more wrestling than story line

Answer 9

well wwe has a big roster but tna has some exiting maches but still wwe

Answer 10

WWE cause it has good types of maches and has paperwies