Did Tom Brady fumble during the reviewed play against Oakland in the playoffs. If you watch the replay very closely.. you can see that it looks like the defender barely touches the ball as Brady is bringing his arm back. This causes the ball to come lose. In that case, it would be a fumble.. not a now infamous "tuck rule" Under those circumstances and probably even without.. it makes the play inconclusive which means the play should have stood on "inconclusive evidence to overturn the call" Here's the important part.. if I'm right about the defender knocking it loose, if there is a shadow of a doubt that is how the play went down... then was it a fumble?
2007-03-04 04:03:25 · 7 answers · asked by 1yugpj 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
It was a clean fumble & the Raiders got screwed.
2007-03-04 04:23:11 · answer #1 · answered by preacher55 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I still believe to this day that was a fumble. Ah, the old days when Charles Woodson wasn't bothered by his coach, and was amazing. The Raiders will always deserve what comes to them
2007-03-04 04:32:10 · answer #2 · answered by shea 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He did tuck the ball when he went down. It was clearly a tuck. Look up tuck rule and watch the video at the same time.
2007-03-04 06:10:57 · answer #3 · answered by J.A. 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Patriots deserved to win it anyway. The Raiders suck look at them now, that was just a team of old geezers.
2007-03-04 04:28:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's history. Get over it.
2007-03-04 04:11:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
definitely not a fumble.
2007-03-04 06:00:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Get over it.
2007-03-04 05:17:18 · answer #7 · answered by chrstnwrtr 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋