civil war is a failure
2007-03-04 03:08:10 · 16 answers · asked by impeachbushnoww 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
None.
2007-03-04 03:11:28 · answer #1 · answered by Gottlos 4 · 7⤊ 5⤋
You requested the incorrect question, judging via the solutions the fifty one% who placed elected king bush have shown up, and nevertheless denying the very undeniable truth that bush lied about iraq having WMD's and so one. yet I provide them credit, they're extremely solid at quoting the right wing bullett factors. you understand, in case you do not help a mendacity president then you definately are not any more helping the troops. We were given rid of Saddam. that would were performed with an assassin, no longer our protection force! no longer one soldier might want to ever die for a LIE! yet submit to in ideas, if we wrestle the lies over there, we do no longer might want to wrestle them over right here. that is accurate, we couldn't besides, our troops our in Iraq besides as a large chew of our nationwide shield. For the record, he isn't any longer my president.
2016-11-27 20:45:26 · answer #2 · answered by mordehay 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is not Bush's war. Right now it belongs to the democratic controlled congress.....thats right...the same congress that was taken control of by the libs....the same libs that ran on the platform that they were going to end the war. What do they do?? Meaningless non-binding resolutions that do nothing but hurt troops morale and reinforce the will of terrorists around the world. If they had a spine they would cut funding and bring them home. But since they dont........quit blaming Bush for this.
2007-03-04 03:16:56 · answer #3 · answered by Johnny Conservative 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Speaking of failed wars, have we all forgot VIETNAM. The Gulf of Tonkin was a staged attack. No Vietanamese ships attacked us to get us involved in their war. RESULT: 58,000 TROOPS DEAD. All because we want control and power.
2007-03-04 05:14:40 · answer #4 · answered by Ted S 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's really funny how the brainwashed GOP supporters talk about the military and how wimpy dems are but have no substance to back up their claims.
Well, it would be funny if Bush and his lemmings weren't destroying America and the world.
Reading the above posts it's obvious that the Bush lemmings have no concept of history, especially recent history.
Hey guy/gals, try doing some research and apply a little critical thinking. You'll stop being brainwashed Bushie lemmings and sounding so freakin' stupid.
2007-03-04 03:17:02 · answer #5 · answered by Jimbo 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
None, our Troops serve with honor, its a concept you wouldn't
understand.
2007-03-04 03:16:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
There's no civil war and no failure yet.
so therefore no troops dead for a failed war.
Keep trying though you guys might get it done.
2007-03-04 03:13:49 · answer #7 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 5⤊ 5⤋
Our guys to the east of here hit Al-Thawra (Sadr City) today.
No casualties.
In my area of West Baghdad, there were not even as much as gunshots.
No casualties.
Choke on it.
2007-03-04 03:18:18 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
this country had a civil war and it wasn't a failure! This is NOT PRESIDENT BUSH"S WAR! a lot of your libtard buddies voted for this in the house and senate. Get your facts straight before you spew your hatred!
2007-03-04 03:13:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 6⤋
way too many. Bush is an absolute idiot and he deserves to be tortured in the same manner he uses in guantanamo.
2007-03-04 03:15:13 · answer #10 · answered by don_megaWC 2 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Does it really matter. One is too many.
2007-03-04 03:14:58 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋