English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After teaching college courses, I got a job in a GED program offered through a college. As a trained researcher (and using common sense), I discovered the following from the most reputable educational research studies: 1% of people who finish their GED ever get an Associate's degree (not even a B.A.); there is virtually no economic benefit for those who get a GED even five years after they've got it. It might make people feel some self-esteem but the self-esteem is gone after two months. These facts have been known for 20 years. Everyone who works in this program acts rah-rah with a 'you can do it' attitude, and the students are not told the GED by itself is basically worthless. When I showed the staff the research, they called me a cynic, or just laughed. Are they brainwashed, deluded, in a state of denial, fools, or just want to save their asses? I feel like I'm in a 1950's sci-fi movie. Is this par for the course (pun intended)?

2007-03-04 02:48:14 · 4 answers · asked by holacarinados 4 in Education & Reference Teaching

By the way, regarding college teachers who teach in GED programs, and the statement that the bulk of them don't have Ph.D.'s. I do have a Ph.D. from a highly ranked university; I left my full-time position because I thought I could make a difference in the lives of the 'disadvantaged.' I quit; Friday is my last day. I guess I'm just naive. My grandfather came to the U.S. many years ago at the age of 16. The only English word he knew was "banana." He received a full scholarship from Columbia University, became a language teacher (six languages--Latin, Russian, English, French, German, Italian, ); and a literary translator. I guess he was a bad model to base by expectations on.

2007-03-05 21:12:22 · update #1

4 answers

I sincerely believe that the dumbing down of teachers, including tenure and relaxed credential programs, as well as bonus for teachers who take university classes (so they won't have as much evening time for their students), plus 40 student class size ~~~ was all designed to lower the over all quality of teachers and educational standards of this country.

Why??? So we would have a 47% drop out rate in schools and have a larger pool of ignorant workers from which to draw.

Why??? So the USA can better compete with third word countries ~~~ lower salary wise.

The GED program is set up by politicians so it looks like they care, when they're the reason behind the whole mess.

Why??? Because the industrial/military complex of the USA owns the politicians.

President Dwight Eisenhower warned us about this way back in the early 1950's. When he said trouble will not comefrom abroad but from our own military/industrial complex. (Not an exact quote, but close).

2007-03-04 08:59:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No offense, but college teachers who tackle GED classes are more likely "just want[ing] to save their asses." I say "teachers" because it is unlikely these people are "professors" with Doctorate Degrees.

The GED is a political initiative--plain and simple. It is a vehicle to give otherwise non-high school degree people a sense of accomplishment. it can prove useful only if a high school degree or equivalent degree (GED) is required--such as enlistment in the US Army.

Just think of all the goofing off, truancy, and pain-in-the-***(ness) many of your students caused for their teachers from grades k-12. When all is said and done, they can focus for six months and still get a high school diploma.

Enjoy the job....

2007-03-04 04:31:14 · answer #2 · answered by Teacher Man 6 · 0 0

LOL, Sarah does quite properly. Palin is truly impressive, she's proved it. you're duped in case you imagine she isn't. She went via the hearth large time with Democrats and Republicans routing out corruption which she did properly, and stuck hell from the Media in Alaska too. She went to the people of Alaska and beat all of them, and did an magnificent pastime for the people of Alaska and that i will guess you may't call a Governor who had higher rankings with both events even as she were given performed. those who declare she's no longer sensible are merely making fools of themselves. The corrupt large authorities scumbags in US politics concern this lady because she would bypass after the corruption, and he or she'd maximum likely beat it. The corrupt in politics can no longer arise with the money for Palin with the skill of the Presidency, it often is the top of their garbage. Palin isn't any light-weight. in truth her or someone like her is exactly what we make certain. She isn't a promote out, she ought to care a lot less about having the skill in her fingers. She's continually performed what she did for the solid of the people. that is why she had the optimal favorably score of any governor in reminiscence. 80 some %. Over 70% approval between democrats. They knew what she did. Sarah also stated demanding cases coming and were given the politicians in Alaska to reduce spending even as they were in SURPLUS. the girl is not merely impressive and visionary, she's quite efficient.

2016-11-27 20:43:26 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It's a way for districts to cover their asses and not have these students, most of whom would not graduate, count against their drop out rate. The same way many districts shuffle low performing students into SPED classes so they won't have to take a state mandated test.

2007-03-04 04:37:15 · answer #4 · answered by teachingeagle 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers