English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

i am sure it may be and y are u wanting to???

2007-03-08 00:48:45 · answer #1 · answered by Mel 5 · 0 0

I am sure that it is dangerous. Any pregnancy for a woman over 35 years of age will also be a high risk for all complications from gestational diabetes to down's syndrome and premature births, lower birth rate, etc. You should talk to your Ob/Gyn and tell them you are considering a reversal. Their are failure rates associated with that surgery also, in other words, you might not get pregnant anyway. I believe there are special considerations for pregnancy if you are a diabetic and those would also apply.

Call your doctor and get in there ASAP to put your mind at ease either way... good luck!

2007-03-04 02:51:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

coverage companies should help be responsive to that a tubal reversal isn't lined, some coverage companies will pay an element of no longer the full eighty% i be responsive to from very own adventure while it contains coverage companies. One guy or woman should help be responsive to no we don't conceal a tubal reversal while yet another agent should help be responsive to confident we do conceal tubal reversals. Get it in writing the only that announces confident. I knew a woman who had a tubal reversal and her coverage paid ninety% of it. She paid the 5,900 for the full technique herself at first then she grew to become the invoice into the claims dept and that they sent her a verify. I had a tubal reversal and that i paid the 5,900 money myself. i replaced into in community college and that i took out a student very own loan and used that money. different's use tax refund money. I desire you all yet good success. I been the place you're stunning now.

2016-09-30 04:40:53 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

First of all, any surgery is dangerous in a diabetic because they have harder times healing. Also with your age, if you want a reversal, you will have less a chance for conception and an increase risk for birth defects.

2007-03-04 02:51:43 · answer #4 · answered by venedypics 3 · 0 0

Sweet, sweet lady - if you are diabetic and 41 years old having a baby is not the best thing. Diabetes is very hard on the body. It causes problems with eyes, feet, kidneys, heart, etc.

My daughter was Type I diabetic and just had a pancreas and kidney transplant. Her kidneys failed and she was on dialysis until the transplant. She is no longer a diabetic but before the transplants she had 9 eyes surgeries to save her eyes.

Please do not do this to your body. I'm saying this with love. My daughter is 40 years old.

2007-03-04 02:51:43 · answer #5 · answered by Jeancommunicates 7 · 1 0

At 41 and diabetic, the reversal itself may not be dangerous, but the resulting pregnancy would be.

2007-03-04 02:53:52 · answer #6 · answered by J.R. 6 · 0 0

Any surgery carries risk. Why bother with the tubal ligation reversal when you could just do IVF to get pregnant and bypass the tubes altoghether! If you research it, you mind even find the cost comparible.

2007-03-04 02:51:31 · answer #7 · answered by Jennifer L 3 · 0 1

why would you want to?

2007-03-04 04:21:07 · answer #8 · answered by matthehat 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers