No he is a whack job and should not hold any office. Not even the one that is in his house.
2007-03-04 02:48:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by bildymooner 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
first of all that is not true. He buys is energy like the rest of us however he also buy credits to offset his"carbon Footprint" The hypocricy really flares up when you investigate the company in which he purchases these credit from...He owns it and is the Chairman. So in essence he is paying himself for his usage albeit most of the money is invested in green stuff.
Would I vote for him, First and foremost he is becoming a very powerful force with a lot of momentum but I think he is too focused on the enviroment to be effective at anything else. There will be times as president in which he may be force to go against his personal convictions for the greater good and I don't think he can do it. The man is very altruistic and I believe his intentions will be good but if he truly wants to make an impact on the environmental movement he shouldn't comprimise that by sitting in the White House. He may be able to do much more for the world where he is. For that reason I wouldn't vote for him.
Pretty tactful for a republican Huh?
Hopefully my party can get its act together and put forward a well rounded canidate so far it is dissappointing.
2007-03-04 10:50:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Texan Pete 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Even as a Democrat I did not vote for him and so we got Bush so if Gore would run again I sure as heck would vote for him.
2007-03-04 11:07:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by EviL 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I can't support Albert Arnold Gore bid for the Presidency because he is a compulsive liar.
2007-03-04 11:09:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by c1523456 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Probably not. Then again, I don't either democrats or republicans. Two sides of the same coin.
Whether or not he's a hypocrit, and whether or not global warming is manmade, he is making people think about how they are dirtying the land, air, and water around themselves.
2007-03-04 10:39:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by mamasquirrel 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
It depends on who he was running against. Right now I'm not ocnvinced he would be more effective than Hillary Clinton.
2007-03-04 10:41:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by teetzijo 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
The only person in politics that actually stands for something (and backs it up) "yes", I would vote for him, again and he would probably win again.
2007-03-04 10:54:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Yemaya 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
He has already won the election once. Why would he want to subject himself to that again?
2007-03-04 11:00:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by arkiemom 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes.
2007-03-04 10:43:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Zapatta McFrench 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
No I wouldn't he just says a lot of crap about global warming so he can get on tv... but if was against something like Darfur then I would so be for him but hes not soz yeah...
2007-03-04 10:39:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋