Ok, I do believe that we should reduce our carbon gas emissions into the atmosphere, but why not just conserve and use energy more wisely. I see that Al Gore recently came under fire for having several expansive homes that consume more energy than an average American. Why wouldn't he work on conserving and reducing his consumption instead of adding to the bureaucracy of adding another layer to this complex subject? This is liberalism gone amuck in my opinion.
2007-03-04 01:48:40 · 4 answers · asked by MaryCheneysAccessory 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Do as I say not as I do. <---Lib philosophy
2007-03-04 01:53:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
No this is politician selling us something to pay taxes on so the big corporation don't have to spend their money fixing the problem they created. I don't advertise by my product every 3 minuets on telivision
and we can not cut back on energy, because the economy depends on use using fuel to buy all these products
2007-03-04 09:58:43 · answer #2 · answered by man of ape 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is actually pretty funny. You actually believe that Al Gore is genuinely trying to "better humanity". Its all political; everyone has an agenda.
2007-03-04 10:07:29 · answer #3 · answered by Alex C 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I AGREE IN BEING RESPONSIBLE TO THE ENVIRONMENT AND TO THE ECONOMY, BUT THE OVERHYPE OF GLOBAL WARMING IS JUST ANOTHER WAY FOR TAKING AMERICA DOWN!
2007-03-04 09:55:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋