a. A person deeply preoccupied with fictious, superstitious spiritual thoughts.
b. A person always ready to use muscle power to humiliate others and get everything without any application of mind or manual labour.
c. A person who is very hardworking, honest, and attentive to his social responsibilities but poor.
2007-03-04 00:11:05 · 8 answers · asked by echaris 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
c-any time.
2007-03-04 16:07:15 · answer #1 · answered by love all 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In modern Progressive times I strongly feel (c) A person who is hardworking,honest and attentive to his social responsibilites but poor is considered to be superior.
Superior as per Shri Bgagbat Gita there are three types of people (1) Swatik (2) Rajashik (3) Tanasik.
Ultimate gainer is Swatik
Rajashik sometime prevails supressing Swatik or Tamashik.
Tamashik sometimes prevails supressing swatik and Rajashik but ultimately Swatik will prevail supressing Rajashik and Tamashik.
The person preoccupied with fictious, supersitious and spirituals are considered to be Tamashik according to Gita
A person always ready to use muscle power to humiate others are considered to be Rajashik. Both have no fuure planning and ultimately will surrender to (c)
2007-03-04 08:30:04 · answer #2 · answered by Gobinda Lal T 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
(a) and (b) were considered superior in medieval and ancient backward and uncivil societies which were founded on fictitious and false theories. The (c) is infact most liked by everyone, everywhere in present meaningful modern age. God will be a very funny and stupid entity if He give top priority to people who are engaged in activities based on mindless, fictious and false, and wild and violent thoughts. It is due to compulsion drawn out of realities of life that (a) and (b) have come down to the status of beggars and thiefs, robbers and cheats at present.
2007-03-08 01:04:49 · answer #3 · answered by bainsal 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You ask the question as if there is a single working ideal from which to answer such a question. There are many such foundations and my answer only reflects my perspective. From what you have offered it is clearly “c” a person who is very hardworking, honest, and attentive to his social responsibilities but poor.
Even so it isn’t the best from my perspective and that would be, a person who is honest with themselves, continually learning, doesn’t initiate harm to others, and is successful within the goals that individual sets.
Reviewing your other questions it is easy to see from where your question arises and no, it isn't dumb.
However, I do suggest that answering your questions would be more meaningful to the Answerer if you selected the "Best Answer" rather than leave it to the voters.
2007-03-04 08:20:18 · answer #4 · answered by Randy 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Answers. a.This person is in a dream world without action.He is fit for nothing.b.This person doesn't have humanity or even you can call him as an unwanted element to the society.c.Working hard,being honest and attentive to his social responsibilities but poor means then he is not brilliant.Without brilliance, whatever the best quality a person has then he is also unfit to become superior.
2007-03-11 00:41:54 · answer #5 · answered by kandaswamyraveendhranperumal 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of us would probably choose letter C? But to be honest, without a little bit of A...creative ideas can't be born nor can they germinate inside the mind.
Humiliation (letter B) is easy. Understanding the reasons we might feel superior over another human being takes REAL BRAIN POWER!
2007-03-11 12:18:14 · answer #6 · answered by argytunes 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you answer is c for what ever wealth you might have//
2007-03-10 11:37:57 · answer #7 · answered by eviot44 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
none
2007-03-04 08:48:11 · answer #8 · answered by no_bsht 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋