2007-03-03 23:56:56 · 15 answers · asked by JPGloye 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The liberal condition is now recognized as a mental disorder, so this explains much of their dysfunctional thought and behavior.
2007-03-03 23:59:59 · answer #1 · answered by Joseph C 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
You believers that this war against Iraq is going to give them civil rights and human rights must be honorable people. Well let me first say we know somewhere around 100,000 to 200,000 citizens of Iraq will never get those rights because their dead. Did anyone ask them how important it was to them? Second why Iraq why not say China civil right violations seem to be going on there or say Russia or India or North Korea, Cambodia, Venezuela, Mexico, etc...
So if giving the Iraq people is so important why not the other counties that violate human rights? Maybe we should start a draft build our army to a size that anytime any country in our opinion violates human rights we can attack them and bring them there human rights. You'd have to be naive to believe that this war is about human rights for the Iraq people.
2007-03-04 01:13:34 · answer #2 · answered by David R 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How would you support your statement saying that liberals oppose citizens gaining civil and human rights in Iraq. If you are coming to that conclusion based on the opposition that most democrats in congress have had to the escalation of the war in Iraq then you are out of touch with reality, and are grossly twisting their objective.
2007-03-04 00:06:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I don't know if that is an accurate statement...I am a democrat and certainly think citizens in Iraq should gain civil rights and human rights, just like all people on earth.
2007-03-04 00:02:29 · answer #4 · answered by christine_ 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The Democrats bypass with maximum people a great number of the time. you may't extremely say that the Iraq warfare resulted contained in the alleviation of people of colour because it isn't over yet and the rustic is largely in a state of civil warfare. the priority ought to become worse even farther and a clean dictator would emerge and oppress the people. also, it isn't people of colour in Iraq that is diverse religions Sunni vs Shite no longer black vs white. as I suggested democrats bypass with maximum people most of the time. i'm no longer even certain the position you got here across a number of this guidance. It does no longer sound thoroughly accurate. Oh and it isn't all the democrats that is maximum people.
2016-11-27 20:32:26 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that's an entirely accurate statement to make. I don't believe democrats are directly opposed, but rather that those rights aren't important enough to tip the balance for them favoring it.
2007-03-04 00:27:28 · answer #6 · answered by The_Music_Man 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What has the Bush Administration done for civil and human rights in Iraq? They've destroyed the Iraqi infrastructure. They've killed 500000+ Iraqis. They've guarenteed that a whole generation of Iraqis will live in terror. And they've destabilized the entire region.
All while stealing our own civil and human rights away from us at home.
The Bush administration has used your fear and your patriotism to systematically destroy the middle class in the United States. The middle class here is now living in poverty. These robber barrons will not stop on their own.
But you apparently are too blinded by their lies to think for yourself or see any of it. If ignorance is bliss, you must be one happy camper.
2007-03-04 00:29:53 · answer #7 · answered by Vernon 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Democrats are not against civil rights or human rights for anyone.In any country! That is not why we are at war in Iraq! How many more of our young people must die before we pull out troups ot of there they are not against the troups we they are against the war! You have been brain washed! Please stop watching Fox news and joinn the rest of your country!
2007-03-04 00:33:54 · answer #8 · answered by Pamela V 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They aren't against those citizens gaining civil and human rights, they're just against Americans dying for it. They think that we should spend all our time and resources on Americans and forget about the rest of the world.
2007-03-04 00:06:04 · answer #9 · answered by Paul H 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
This is not what the Bush administration is doing and even Gerald Ford said this invasion and occupation as well as nation building is NOT in the national interest. Why do supporters of the Cheney - Bush administration keep insisting this neocon empire building actually benefits those in Iraq? Why are the Cheney/Bush administration supporters such hypocrites?
Why can't we have civil rights in AMERICA ? What is wrong with habeas corpus, privacy, freedom from unreasonable detention and torture ?
2007-03-04 00:14:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
They are less concerned with giving these rights to others than they are concerned with having them taken away in the US.
2007-03-04 00:47:57 · answer #11 · answered by Charlie S 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋