ben laden living in wazirestan the state of pakistan
us army campaign in afghanestan the thousands KM far away in order to captuer him . only few meters remain to catch the murderer
pakistan government surly encourage & accompanying . so why
2007-03-03 23:22:25 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Terrific question! We SHOULD have by now! It's been 6 years!
I believe that Bush was justified in invading Iraq, but I don't understand WHY he didn't make sure Bin Laden was dead first! After all, it was Bin Laden and his cronnies who attacked us, not Iraq!
By the way, how do some of you people believe that our government caused 9-11?
2007-03-04 01:42:00 · answer #1 · answered by godlyteengirl 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Isn't it obvious..? Bush knows he wasn't responcable for 9/11, the confession vid is almost certainly a fake and Bin Laden came out a few days after 9/11 on Al Jazeera as saying he had nothing to do with it and as that as a muslim he does his best not to lie. Was that shown in the US at the time, err.. NO! And as Dubya also said he doesn't spend that much time thinking about him. He's probably too busy rolling in money conned from the US people. I suggest you check Saudi Arabia, as that is where all of the alledged hijackers came from, and several of the alledged hijackers are still alive and have been interviewed.. go figure. But of course Saudi Arabia owns like 15% of Americas economy.. so they won't be invading there anytime soon.
Squeegie- the Bush Administration are alot of things.. but they are NOT idiots.
2007-03-03 23:32:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bin laden could desire to have been our suitable precedence. Bush of direction needed Saddam to instruct to Daddy that "he replaced into the guy". timber manliness gets in way of easy experience. there's no information of the demise of Bin laden. on the different, there is extra information that he's alive. And each and all of the Guardsmen that have been sent to Iraq; continuously makes me ask your self whether we've sufficient to guard us in a terrostic attack. Bush has made a gigantic mess of something that did not situation us. Saddam could have killed alot of his very own people yet he did not enable them to kill one yet another. What ever we do at this factor Iraq would be in chaos for an prolonged time. somewhat of Spreading Democracy he has unfold demise and destruction. I won't even touch the oil element. no person will see oil from there for an prolonged time.
2016-10-17 05:52:18 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you forget Ben Laden broke bread with the Bushes and many others in the government and the cia,They need him alive to fuel the fire, get over it Ben Laden is a part of our government. people are dispensable and money is better than god. MONEY IS KING
2007-03-03 23:34:58 · answer #4 · answered by man of ape 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing the Republicans would love more than to present the head of Osama Bin Ladin to the world (especially with elections approaching). He is being sought by special forces.
Anything else you hear is pure speculation. Where he is, what he is doing etc. The conspiracy kooks are conspiracy kooks. What can anyone say to soothe their fevered brow?
2007-03-03 23:54:33 · answer #5 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i just happen to tune into Alex jones as he was discussing the topic of CIA involvement in this "managed" war on terror. He is a firm believer that OUR own government is part of this of hoax war to establish FEAR and the one world government, NOT in the name of freedom but in the name of slavery.
if you want I can send you an audio file. otherwise you can go to the address below
Al CIA = alquaeda
2007-03-03 23:38:19 · answer #6 · answered by Priestcalling 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
First, they're so focused on Iraq they can't take the time to think about anything else...
second, and most importantly, I think it's really simple:
they have no idea where he is, and if they talk about it, they'll have to admit they don't know!
2007-03-04 00:04:13 · answer #7 · answered by jon_r_patrick 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
usa is not chasing ben laden she is chasing oil and sustenance for her future
2007-03-04 01:36:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
i was ready to tackle this question but its been covered all ready, that is bush used him as a way to invade the middle east and eventually get into iraq, ITS ALL ABOUT THE MONEY!!!
2007-03-03 23:45:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
To put in the words of the president, "Bin who"?
2007-03-04 02:17:22 · answer #10 · answered by wondermom 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋