Just because it has the component/molecule of oxygen means it is living is not right , therefore it cannot die too.
2007-03-03 21:59:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This single experiment is not sufficient to answer your question. If that scientist really got the above answer, he has some more work to do to confirm the hypothesis and come to a conclusion. So until then ... the water is water and you and me need it to live, irrespective of whether it is dead or living.
2007-03-04 05:41:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by karu_malar 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can you say to the Hydrogen gas and Oxygen gas living or death? water is the combination of these two; however, it is a source of living for living creatures, but naturally it is just an element that has nothing with life and death. yah, if you consider this way, you can take advantage of water when it is clean in many ways to save a life; however when it is too dirty, it is of no use for living creatures, as ditchs, so you may call it death water.
2007-03-04 05:43:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Alkahest 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Water that can read japanese writing? I doubt it. What exactly are ugly crystals?
Now, for water to 'see' writing, it would have to absorb some light rather than transfer it, as clear fluids (like water) do.
2007-03-04 06:15:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Matthew P 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
inanimate objects are neither living or deceased. something cannot be dea if it is never alive. considering most objects are made of chemicals that may have once belonged to living things you could say objects are dead. water though is made of h20 and contaminents. if you mean h20 when you say water at it's purest form then its never been alive or dead.
2007-03-04 05:34:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Another☼Human 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Subconsciously he must have treated the "I'll kill you" tube more roughly, and disturbed the crystal growth.
2007-03-04 05:40:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gervald F 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
How can something that supports ''life'' in every way, be dead ?
I wish the jap. scientist had used the time & energy involved in the abv experiment to find out something more relevant e.g. where do we come from & what happens to us wn we depart from this world etc etc. na ?????
2007-03-04 05:53:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by ๏๓ รђคภtเ, รђคภtเ รђคภtเ ....... ! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
ofcourse water is definitely not a living thing but is highly essential for every living one on this earth
2007-03-04 05:50:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by vasantha 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Does water take in oxygen and food and expel wastes?
Therefore it isn't living.
2007-03-04 06:58:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tigeress 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Water is actully non-living. And the scientist who performed the experiment please someone ask him when and from where did water learn to read?
2007-03-04 10:05:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by manarshh_jot 2
·
0⤊
0⤋