Of course not!! It has nothing to do with gay men from one country being better than another. Gay marriage in Canada is legal because most of our politicians and judges aren't as easily influenced by the bigots and hatemongers as they are in the USA.
2007-03-03 22:21:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by castle h 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'm Canadian and a gay male and I see no reason why gay men or gay women for that matter in my country would consider themselves better just because it is legal for us to get married and it is not for our USA brothers and sisters!
There might be some other reason why we are better Ashley but not for that reason! hehe
Ashley where have you been, we have missed you!
*hugs*
JAC<
in Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA
2007-03-03 21:37:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by jackaboo007 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
5 states known gay marriage. Wow. Out of like, 50 states? ALL of england recognises gay marriage, and treats gay equivalent. In some American states, human beings think of gays are evil and could be burnt on the stake and all non-Christians could be killed. As a neopagan, i hit upon that troubling. additionally, in u.s., you nonetheless have the death penalty and as a individual against it, I finished heartedly help my u . s .'s ban. In u.s., curiously you could incredibly get get admission to to a gun, besides, on a similar time as weapons are unlawful in Britain. huge difficulty there and letting a team of religious, gay-hating extremists have weapons isn't the wisest decision. finally, there is the full women persons in the army difficulty you point out. earlier I initiate i'd prefer to assert i'm lady. I understand the coolest judgment in no longer permitting women persons on the front lines, because of the fact women persons are many times much less violent and bodily weaker. we are actually not inferior in spite of the undeniable fact that, and would incredibly help in different procedures, being completely integrated in the army as an entire. In u.s., in spite of the undeniable fact that ladies persons would function protection tension police, try against pilots, on try against ships, and submarines, lady provider contributors are prohibited via coverage from intentional project to particular floor try against forces. In Britain, considering the fact that 2000, sexual orientation has no longer been a ingredient seen in recruitment, and gays can serve overtly in the militia, in comparison to in the U. S. militia as an occasion. All branches of the forces have actively recruited at gay delight activities. The forces save no formal figures relating to the style of gay and lesbian serving squaddies, asserting that the sexual orientation of workers is seen beside the point and not monitored, in comparison to in the U. S. with it incredibly is "do no longer Ask, do no longer tell" coverage. because of the fact the coverage replaced into enacted in 1993 via President bill Clinton, 1000's of provider contributors have persevered to be discharged whilst their orientation got here to the attention of the protection tension. and that i'm no longer even began on the full black difficulty. In Britain (so some distance as i understand), there is hardly any racism in direction of black human beings in any respect. yet in the U. S., you mostly hear approximately black human beings getting abuse from authority figures. it incredibly is sickening.
2016-12-14 10:17:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope not, because American gay men are better. Those Canadians are so annoying with their beady little eyes and their flapping heads. :O)
2007-03-03 21:24:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jay S 5
·
3⤊
4⤋
Don't you have anything better to do than plaster this forum with your stuff? No, they don't feel that.
2007-03-04 00:00:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Busta 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. That reason is ridiculous.
2007-03-03 21:21:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by CAD 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I doubt it.
2007-03-03 22:02:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
0⤋