I have no morals. And here is the reason. Morals are basically mental prisons and walls built from ideas of other peoples mind that you blindly accept as your own. But morality is pointless. It restricts you to what you can and cannot do, and the only things that is stopping you is YOU and yor ideas. And when you realy think about it, morals are nothing more then subjective opinions and nothing more. You can either be truly free to live your life to the fullest and however you want OR you can live your life based upon false ideas and opinions that hold no real meaning in an objective world. Morals are nothing more than a restriction of your true self. Who is to say what is truly right and “wrong”. The answer is there there is no right and wrong only opinions of it. And opinions are NOT fact. Some people follow laws and some follow the bible despite the stories of rape murder and slavery. And other such as myself live a free life.
2007-03-03
19:40:17
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
i am not bitter in any way. im happy as can be, because i do not limit myself with such rediculous ideas such as religeous faith and ideas. im free and i am loving and living life to the fullest
2007-03-03
19:48:45 ·
update #1
those are the words of a very bitter person. yes, i have morals. morals are built into you, you can deny it all you want but it's true. morals are there, your just ignoring them. May God Bless you.
peace
2007-03-03 19:45:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Shadow Lark 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
You may not admit it, but you have morals. Those are the things that your parents and friends would have instilled within you from a child. Let's take for example, the moral that do unto others as you would wish for yourself, or something like that. It's a fact of life. Do bad, it's going to come around. I mean, we are free to do 'bad' if we want to, there's nothing stopping us. But one day, for all the wrongs that you have done, all that negative energy is going to come back and get you, to make you suffer. If you want to live a happy life, this moral could help you. But it is up to you to decide whether you want to be happy. And you say that you are happy, so I suppose that you are following that moral, whether you like it or not! These are not proved by science, so it can be considered as opinion. In /my/ opinion, this is true, cause I have seen what comes around goes around. Life is an experience, and I have experienced much in this matter.
2007-03-03 20:00:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by pessimistic_popcorn 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I care about certain things and not others and thus have very strong preferences for certain things to happen and others not to happen. I also think that certain actions result from alienation and lack of care and others stem from awareness and care and acceptence of the other as they show themselves
but with that said I don't believe in any objective moral order. I do not belief that anything I do or anyone does is what one OUGHT to do or OUGHT NOT to do or what is RIGHT or WRONG. I think all those statements about what one ought to do are false, or at best as yet without any evidence in their favor. so if one defines moral as a kind of objective criteria as to what one ought to do then no i decidedly do not have them
However, it simply does not follow from that that I do not take responsibility for my actions. Indeed in the absence of an objective moral order then the only reason I have for doing something is because I want to do it where this want is the result of my personality, the degree to which I care, my relative awareness or alienation from myself, others, and the world. So in that sense in the lack of objective moral order I take MORE not less responsibility for my actions than the moral person precisely because these actions depend entirely on ME and my take on life as opposed to an objective system seperate from me that I am merely following. So if I don't murder someone it's because i care about them and don't want to murder them (which says something about my stance towards murder) rather than the moral person who does not murder because one ought not to murder (this says nothing about their stance on murder, it merely indicates they follow what they think are objective moral laws, and since there are no such things, such a person lives in a state of alienation from reality and is actually escaping from reality, thus their care is not 'genuine' caring but is caring that is the result of escapism and alienation)
2007-03-04 20:24:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kos Kesh 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anarchist, right? You can blather as much as you want about no right or wrong.. You are entitled to your opinion. There is right and wrong. Lying, cheating, stealing, WRONG. Honesty, ethics, values, RIGHT. You don't do unto others and then get the hell out. I'm glad you think you have a free life. Do you accept any responsibility for anything? Guess not.
2007-03-04 12:46:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
look to the Bible for guidance
2007-03-03 19:48:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lisa Chosen 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
sorry, i have morals, I had parent's that cared, don't ask me to break any of my morals, I won't do it, you got the wrong pigeon !
2007-03-03 19:50:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I do but I always leave them at home.
2007-03-03 19:48:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by JD2B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋