English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-03 17:30:48 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football (American)

12 answers

LT on the strength of his all round game. Johnson is a beast and a workhorse, and if I needed 3 yards I'd give it to him before LT, but LT is better in almost every facet of the game.

Also, I think that LJ is going to drop off significantly this year. He'll never get 1,700 yards again.

That said, I want to agree with the guy above me: Frank Gore is the far and away favorite for the Rushing Title next year. In fact, my money is on Gore being the league's next superstar. Gore just scratched the surface last year, and it was scary good.

2007-03-03 17:49:36 · answer #1 · answered by The Brain 3 · 0 0

You have to go with LT on this question. It's not a mark on Larry Johnson, but LT has had better seasons and is more versatile. LT can catch better and is a little faster. His dark visor also makes him look like a bad ***, so you just can't pick Larry Johson in this situation.

2007-03-04 04:25:32 · answer #2 · answered by logan_hart_90 2 · 0 0

no brainer lt is better , catches passes out of the backfield better and is quicker on moves
were larry is more of a power running back and the system he is in dont throw as much to the backs
next year frank gore will be the nfl yard leader

2007-03-03 17:42:30 · answer #3 · answered by fat_keebler_elf 3 · 0 0

I think scheme has a lot to do with it, so we will have to wait and see. I think that if the Chiefs can patch up their Offensive line enough to hold back spit, LJ should have another big year. LT is awesome too though, but the new coaching staff could actually make his production worse.

2007-03-03 20:29:45 · answer #4 · answered by drbuns 5 · 0 0

Larry Johnson is to one dimensional. LT is arguably the most versatile back in league history. And he's HUMBLE!!

2007-03-03 17:40:39 · answer #5 · answered by Navydoc 2 · 0 0

I would have to say LT is the better running back, because he has talent all around. He can run, catch, and pass.

2007-03-03 17:35:30 · answer #6 · answered by C_cat 1 · 0 0

LT. Although LJ is great as well. LT is a better all-around back.

2007-03-04 00:52:38 · answer #7 · answered by Drunk365 7 · 0 0

Lt 100%...............LJ isnt even a comparison, hes only in his 3rd year i believe. as fas as im concerned LT has much more experience and has more ypg then LJ will ever have

2007-03-04 09:19:12 · answer #8 · answered by steelershq 2 · 0 0

LT

2007-03-04 02:11:27 · answer #9 · answered by RUFFLES#2 3 · 0 0

LT

2007-03-03 18:00:47 · answer #10 · answered by Dave & Sunny 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers