English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How are you guys saying that "WWE cannot come close to TNA in a million years?" How come you never read my questions? How come you just answer a question in 1 sentence. Give me A DETAIL on how TNA is not coming close to WWE. I would like to just know. They have been putting up A LOT more impressive things. They bring in more celebrities than WWE. They bring up more and more events. They have more impressing matches. The superstars aren't afraid to take a fall and take any bloodshed.

You all WWE homers like all you cena fans, The Undertaker R.I.P, all of you Jeff Hardy fans (He was in TNA punks and they even gave him a BIGGER RISE than WWE ever has!), and everyone else dissing TNA give me a reason why TNA will never reach WWE.

WCW did it, how long did they lead WWF in TV ratings?

2007-03-03 16:40:55 · 3 answers · asked by Lunatic 2 in Sports Wrestling

3 answers

TNA is still short on Talent. Sting is good, but getting up thier in age and most sting fans liked the old sting better. Christian Cage wasn't headliner material in WWE so he let his contract expire to go to TNA where he could headline, but he still isn't headliner material. Angle was a good pick up, but people get tired of him quickly. They had Jeff Hardy for a while, but they were still stuck on Jeff Jarrett ( probably cause Jarrett founded TNA ) so they didn't utilize Hardy like they should have. TNA still doesn't have that headliner character that will draw the masses. They are missing thier "Hulk Hogan" or "The Rock" type of talent.

TNA does not have the money WCW did to compete for talent. There are a lot of guys in WWE who are being put off while relics like Ric Flair still get matches on Raw and on the PPV. If TNA had the money vince has, half of those guys would leave.

TNA is OK and I'll watch it, but it can't compete with WWE right now. Maybe in a few years if they get some better talent.

2007-03-03 19:23:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Answer your question in one sentence when you just practically wrote your thesis/rant about TNA?
1. WWE is a multi billion dollar business. TNA is not.
2. Some of those great wrestlers on TNA come from the WWE. Even went back.
3. WWE wrestlers are stars in their own right. So, who cares about
TNA bringing more celebraties?
4. WCW might have lead the ratings war, but last time I checked, the company also go bought out.
5. Why are you essentially posting the same crap twice?

2007-03-03 17:17:09 · answer #2 · answered by Ash 5 · 0 1

1.vince has billions tna has millions 2 .tna had no talanted wrestlers 3.TNA stands for total nostop anal ***. XD

2007-03-03 16:51:22 · answer #3 · answered by Undertaker12345678 1 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers