With Bush in control, you never know.
2007-03-03 16:31:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by notyou311 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Iran is developing nuclear weapons, but probably has some years to go. The probability of war now is less than10% because Iran is not yet a clear and present danger. There is a good chance that Iran will have a change of leadership and a change of policy before any nukes are built and used. In this case, the probability of war will fall to 0%. If Iran follows the present course, and gets to within 3 months of having operational nukes, the probability of war will rise to 99%. I think that cooler heads will prevail before Iran's nuclear program gets to such an advanced stage. The recent meeting between the Saudis and Iranians to diffuse tensions in Iraq and Lebanon is a positive sign.
2007-03-04 02:35:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by d/dx+d/dy+d/dz 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would be a very dangerous move on the behalf of our Military in Iraq and Afghan, and here at home.
I pray that both Iran and the U.S. take measures to protect its people, without nuclear war.
According to Bible Prophecy Iran and Russia will attack Israel, this is the beginning of the end of the age as we know it.
In answer to your question, those chances are good, especially if the President of Iran keep wagging his tongue. I believe we are a lot closer to war with Iran than we know.
2007-03-04 00:56:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by NJ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The United Nations' 60-day deadline given to Iran to halt its sensitive nuclear activities has expired.
Iran remains defiant, insisting that it is exercising its "inalienable rights" to peaceful nuclear technology, wondering aloud why it is asked to deprive itself of aspects of the same technology fully enjoyed by others.
The United States and its European allies are now gearing up for a third Security Council resolution that could lead to sanctions in addition to those imposed in December.
On the diplomatic front, the Swiss proposal (submitted to Larijani in Bern last week as he was returning from a security conference in Munich) calls for full nuclear transparency, continued Iran-IAEA cooperation and the resumption of negotiations around the international incentive package presented to Iran last year by the so-called 5+1 (the UN Security Council's permanent five - the United Kingdom, China, France, Russia and the US - plus Germany). is a "dry enrichment" approach that stops the core function of centrifuges by injecting uranium hexafluoride into them. It would be the suspension of uranium enrichment without stopping centrifuge operations. The advantage of this option is that it provides a technical middle point where both sides in the nuclear crisis can converge. If adopted, it would mean that for the duration of any negotiations, Iran would refrain from enriching uranium while continuing with its pilot program and the busy chores of its scientists.
According to a semi-official Iranian website, Baztab.com, Iran has agreed in principle to the Swiss proposal and a key purpose of Larijani's European trip is to nail an agreement around it.
It is possible that a Gulf of Tonkin type incident will set off a conflict in the Persian Gulf. In the persian Gulf, the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower carrier group is being supplemented by the USS John Stennis carrier group. Maintaining two carrier groups and support vessels in the Persian Gulf is hugely expensive, so once all the components for an attack are in place, there will be incentive to use them. A Kuwaiti newspaper, relying on confidential sources in the Emirate's government, predicts that the attack will take place before the first week of April.
The carrier aircraft, useless against insurgents and terrorists in Iraq, can only be employed in a war with Iran, while the minesweepers would be needed to keep clear the Strait of Hormuz for oil tankers and other shipping.
2007-03-04 20:28:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obviously everyone hopes that will not happen I do think Iran may come in & destabilize Iraq I believe there already some Iranians in there causing trouble
2007-03-04 00:33:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by hobo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are currently meeting with our good friends the Saudis. So maybe there will be another terrorist attack on the U.S.
Bush dearly wants a war with Iran. The people in both countries do not. Time to replace the power-grabbers in both.
2007-03-04 00:54:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gaspode 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
the chance of american to attack iran is 60% iran want's to attack isreal and america is under document to be on the side of isreal and if america attack's iran then lebanan would more likely to attack on america. so if iran dose not do any stupid stuff to motivate america to blow up israel then.................america will not attack
2007-03-04 00:56:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by shah 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
chances are 50/50 in my opinion. im here in iraq myself and were finding iranian stuff here, but on the other hand the american public is getting tired of this stuff, but on that note, i dont want to, but its my job, and if told to do so i will, i wont be smiling about it though i can promise you that
2007-03-04 00:36:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by abc123 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Any thing Is possibly be poor pared.
2007-03-04 02:06:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Unoptrid1aq 4
·
0⤊
1⤋