TNA is a ripoff of WWE they want to be like WWE but they can't ,WWE has the best ratings in tv history TNA does not, WWE has the best wrestlers now and of all times TNA does not and WWE was the first wrestling company to ever make it world wide,Thus WWE is the best
2007-03-03 15:57:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by KEV 3000 2
·
2⤊
4⤋
TNA isn't even at the level of the old WCW yet. Don't get me wrong, I like TNA and they have a good talent or two, but they aren't at WWEs level yet. I don't know why WWE die hards get so upset. WWE was at its best during the mondy night wars with WCW and after the buyout, they went down hill. Hopefully the oncoming TNA will force Vince and WWE to have some fresh storylines and better matches than this stupid "Battle of the Billionairs"
2007-03-03 18:41:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
TNA is better than WWE TNA comes up with new matches every 6 months
2007-03-03 15:48:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by bigmatrixmaster 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
WWE>TNA because: a million) better tale strains. 2) Wrestlemania. 3) better Wrestlers. 4) way better PPV. 5) Royal Rumble journey. 6) elimination Chamber journey. 7) better Entrances. 8) way extra specialist. 9) they have historic previous compared to TNA. 10) better Promos. 11) better/unique wrestling strikes. 12) better/unique Gimmicks. 13) hall of recognition. 14) better Championships. 15) better Boss That receives fascinated about Storylines. 16) better section. 17) way better rankings(Which tutor the point:WWE>TNA) 18) Hell in a cellular journey. 19) way better and specialist statement. 20) way better Announcers. 21) extra manufacturers. 22) NxT. 23) youthful abilities. 24) no longer a collection of previous adult men limping around the hoop. 25) Drafts. 26) Non-hypocritical followers 27) extra exciting. 28) better Divas. 29) doesn't bash on different wrestling agencies in the course of the tutor. 30) The Undertaker. i'm no longer declaring WWE is perfect..as count number of knowledge i visit record extra Flaws contained in the WWE than that,yet WWE is larger than TNA. i do not hate TNA..I watch TNA often times. As For Now ..i visit work out a great number of TNA Marks in this question thumbing down different solutions so,Come on now TNA pups Thumb Down the Hell out of me i does no longer provide a Rat's ***.
2016-11-27 20:04:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
tna just doesn`t have the power that the wwe has right now. It`s probably huge where it`s based in Florida but thats it.
2007-03-04 00:04:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Wrestle Man 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
tna rocks for someone who loves jeff hardy maybe you should take in the fact that jeff hardy signed a contract with tna and was there for quite a while.i have seen wwe and in its best day it is still a soap opra.
2007-03-03 19:43:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by STEENILIZER!!! 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
LISTEN JEFF HARDY LOVER, I TOTALY AGREE WITH U , TNA SUX, HELL I DON'T EVEN LIKE CHRISTIAN CAGE!
DID U EVER SEE THE AUDIENCE THERE , IT IS SO SMALL, GO TO A WWE EVENT AND YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE SPACE TO STAND! SO I'M SAYING WWE RULES!
2007-03-03 16:11:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by DEADMAN TAKER 4LIFE 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
WWE 1
2007-03-03 15:38:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by glamour04111 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
TNA is the future
WWE is the present
2007-03-03 16:25:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by KeNnEdY a.K.a. Styles clash 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
TNA is better because it has better wrestling and better talent.
2007-03-04 01:00:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by HHH 6
·
0⤊
1⤋