English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

God help us if that is true.

America better look behind that phony smile she is wearing and phony fur-sod she is putting on which, will all be gone if she wins the election.

There are to many freedoms at stake that she has her sights set on.

2007-03-03 13:37:56 · 20 answers · asked by smially 3 in Social Science Gender Studies

Arielle, Good point. Didn't think of that which, would split the vote. Good point.

2007-03-03 13:57:23 · update #1

Actually Baba, I know how to spell her name.

The Clinton's have always reminded me of my shop vac out in the garage.
It always make a lot of noise
It always sucks
It is always full of crap.

And that's Hillary <== see I can spell it.

O! Thanks for the correction.

2007-03-03 15:33:40 · update #2

20 answers

More women won't vote for Hillary solely because she's a woman than will vote for her solely because she's a woman.

2007-03-03 13:42:06 · answer #1 · answered by vallygval 5 · 1 1

Every person has got some good qualities along with his/her full beg of bad qualities. same is true for most of the politicians. At the time of asking for the votes they may make so many promises that even they themselves do not remember once they win the election. I do not see any reason for Hillary Clinton not behaving in the similar fashion. Now the question comes what are the good qualities she has pretended to have and whether these qualities will be enough for the voters to vote for her. As the situation stands today it seems she has been able to earn some good will amongst the people and will be able to win favour from women of America.

2007-03-09 16:20:59 · answer #2 · answered by sb 7 · 0 1

Not only did you misspell Hillary, but you totally butchered "facade" as well.

I'm hoping Barack Obama wins the primaries, but if Clinton wins I will vote for her. Has nothing to do with her being a woman -- but it has a lot to do with the Bush Administration's horrible job, along with the war-mongering policies of that unnecessary war in Iraq.

2007-03-10 16:02:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I think most women will vote for the candidate their husbands vote for. Maybe 5-10% at most would vote for Hillary because she is a woman. And I would say the same number would vote against her for that same reason.

2007-03-03 14:00:10 · answer #4 · answered by Campo 4 · 1 1

When are you dimwits going to realize that hillary or the next president and the president after that is going to keep ruining americas ****, the way it happend since Reagan. Dont you think the system is infected if president after president keeps building the national debt at ever increasing speeds ? Dont you think that, if that is the ONE thing each president since reagen did virgously, that the people who might have an interest in the national debt of America increasing put themselfs in a position where they can control who gets to run for office?

2007-03-03 15:38:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Weak women can become jealous of more successful women. So I don't think the mass majority of women will end up voting for Hilary because although shes a slez, shes successful.

2007-03-09 16:07:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

How many women will vote for HILLARY Clinton for NO other reason than she is a WOMAN? In order to vote, you used to be required to pass a literacy test. I'm not sure doing away with that law was a good idea.

I'm voting for Condoleezza Rice because she plays the piano.

2007-03-03 16:14:08 · answer #7 · answered by WESS LB 2 · 1 4

Although I'm not a woman, I wouldn't vote for her for the same reasons I wouldn't for most old white folks who usually run for president. She sounds like a robot when she talks, emotionless and fake, similar to most of the other folks who ran for it. Obama is the only person to run that I'm actually interested in and excited for. He sounds like a human being when he talks and what he talks about. He has energy. It's actually the first time I've been excited about the person running.

It's sort of like when Kerry and Bush were running for president. Bush sounded like a complete idiot when he spoke, like a crooked car salesman who didn't know what he was talking about. Kerry sounded intelligent and direct when he spoke and answered questions.

2007-03-03 19:47:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I wouldn't vote for her EVER! She is scary! I know it would be interesting to have a woman prez, but I think I could wait. OMG, I do not think she is even a woman, more like a monster! No offense to the people who like her. This is my opinion.

2007-03-03 14:56:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I'm a Democrat, but I'd rather vote for Gore (please run!!) or Edwards over Hillary. NOT because she's a woman, but because her politics are a bit conservative for my liking. She's pretty pro-war.

2007-03-03 14:14:00 · answer #10 · answered by stormsinger1 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers