2007-03-03 13:20:47 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
That which has been created cannot ever fathom that which creates. When the time is right, the answer to your question will be revealed.
2007-03-03 13:27:20 · answer #1 · answered by darkdiva 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
-You didn't mean that did you, that is totally bizaar?
--Where in the world did you get that idea, it does not even fit in with old science, less the latest in the factual sciences?
--Why would we need our brain if that is case--WHERE HAVE ALL THOSE SPECIAL CELLS GONE, If they are so superior to the brain?---You actually saw that idea in writing?
--Note some conclusions that proven science has come up with:
*** ce chap. 14 p. 176 par. 18 The Human Miracle ***
18 Carl Sagan, amazed that the human brain could hold information that “would fill some twenty million volumes,” stated: “The brain is a very big place in a very small space.”23 And what happens in this small space defies human understanding. For example, imagine what must be going on in the brain of a pianist playing a difficult musical composition, with all fingers flying over the keys. What an astonishing sense of movement his brain must have, to order the fingers to strike the right keys at the right time with the right force to match the notes in his head! And if he hits a wrong note, the brain immediately lets him know about it! All this incredibly complex operation has been programmed into his brain by years of practice. But it is made possible only because musical capability was preprogrammed into the human brain from birth."
--;Why would scientists not give evoutionary cells of the highest rating, no not evolutionary scientists, although they themselves are making major conclusions against a dying theory?
--Do your evolutionary cells, if they existed, contain anywhere near the capacity of even one computer?
--Note a comparison of just one brain:
*** ct chap. 4 pp. 50-51 How Unique You Are! ***
Your Marvelous Brain
For years man’s brain has been likened to a computer, yet recent discoveries show that the comparison falls far short. “How does one begin to comprehend the functioning of an organ with somewhere in the neighborhood of 50 billion neurons with a million billion synapses (connections), and with an overall firing rate of perhaps 10 million billion times per second?” asked Dr. Richard M. Restak. His answer? “The performance of even the most advanced of the neural-network computers . . . has about one ten-thousandth the mental capacity of a housefly.”
Although hereditary factors may have a role in mental performance, modern research shows that our brain is not fixed by our genes at the time of conception. “No one suspected that the brain was as changeable as science now knows it to be,” writes Pulitzer prize-winning author Ronald Kotulak. After interviewing more than 300 researchers, he concluded: “The brain is not a static organ; it is a constantly changing mass of cell connections that are deeply affected by experience.”—
2007-03-03 14:58:05 · answer #2 · answered by THA 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
WHAT?
Evolution is a result of environmental and social disruptions!
Change occurs when faced with extreme conditions.
So what has cells got to do with it?
It is NOT a planned event, or a intelligent intervention!
IT IS NATURE!
2007-03-03 13:27:21 · answer #3 · answered by tattie_herbert 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Huh? It seems you lack even a basic understanding of modern science. Perhaps if you take a class on biology at your local junior college, you'd be able to form questions on the subject that are more coherent and better defined. Just an idea...
2007-03-03 13:36:07 · answer #4 · answered by The Man In The Box 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You mean mutating cells?
Mutation that leads on to natural selection...
CELLS DO NOT CHOOSE TO MUTATE
as, said by others its a natural, random occurance.
Alternatively- Cells control the brain. Thats why they have outsmarted the brain. The brain does not control it.
2007-03-03 13:30:40 · answer #5 · answered by Chiy9u 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who says they are more intelligent? Some creationist pastor or a sock puppet. Not worth answering any further.
2007-03-03 22:48:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
er, a drug won't be able to intervene with evolution, they could mess it up and tweak it with the help of giving the mess united statesthe means to professional-create yet you will no longer make smarter infants with the help of hopping up on mentats.
2016-10-02 08:25:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't even know what you are talking about. Maybe you could clarify? WHICH cells are intelligent in WHAT manner?
2007-03-03 13:43:04 · answer #8 · answered by Dr. Zaius 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Your implicit definition of "intelligence" is elusive.
2007-03-03 13:27:11 · answer #9 · answered by Jerry P 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What?!?!?
2007-03-03 13:42:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋