Well, we know that they existed. He used them . The question is : what happened to them. No doubt they existed. Iraqi Air Force General Georges Asad recently wrote his book which explains dates, times and people. The WMD's are in Syria, transported there under the guise of humanitarian earthquake relief. Do Democrats hate Bush so much and are they so tied to their own convenient belief that they will not accept this?
2007-03-03 13:16:09 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
If there were as many intelligence sources in 2002, saying that Saddam's possession of WMD was uncertain, as there are now climatologists saying that Gore's alarms about global warming are uncertain, Bush could rightly be criticized for misrepresenting the facts.
Yet all the intelligence agencies of the US plus the intelligence agencies of Britain, Germany, Russia, China, Israel and France said the same. Even those who opposed the invasion of Iraq agreed on this. Do people think the President could have doctored the all the evidence available to US agencies? And the same to the European intelligence agencies too?
2007-03-03 13:55:39 · answer #1 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What WMDs? It has been proven time and time again that the CIA and the Pentagon intentionally composed false information to convince Bush that they needed to take Saddam out. Former Secretary of State Colin Powell even admitted it was a huge mistake. To this day, more and more people who were involved in the administration or the planning of the invasion are coming out saying going to Iraq was a mistake.
Ever since our troops set foot in Iraq, nothing has been found when it comes to WMDs.
Yes, they started a scandal for the UN oil-for-food program, but Saddam was not a threat to anyone because the economic sanctions crippled much of their spending.
Again, there were no WMDs. With that fact, the neocons and the administration said Saddam was connected to 9/11. Again, that was proven to be a lie.
When will you realize that everything that's going on in Iraq and Afghanistan is happening because of a bunch of lies? Are you that delusional?
2007-03-03 22:17:19 · answer #2 · answered by brotherb95 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If we were to chase every weapon in the world down we would be going in circles.
We have a Chemicals Weapons Depot, Lab,Scientists, WMDs that are so old we have to make new and improved ones.
I do not like the smoke and mirrors they are here, no here, uhm ok, he hid them over there. We invaded wrong country, sorry for the inconvenience.Pardon US, it won't happen again.
We put the people that were war mongers on our coins, Ike,Kennedy, Wilson, and now Bush.
Cheer up and vote war away. or don't.
2007-03-03 21:43:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They existed in the minds of Bush, Cheney, Rice and Rumsfelt.
2007-03-04 14:46:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has been shown conclusively that they didn't exist, and now the Bush administration is being forced to admit that its false charges that North Korea was enriching uranium were based on faked or incorrect intelligence also. When will Bush quit lying?
2007-03-03 21:24:21 · answer #5 · answered by Larry 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
There was a CIA agent on the ground before the invasion. He interviewed a whole bunch of locals who told him that Saddam buried them underground in a sewer area and then flooded it. The US military didn't want to bother with trying to look for them there since it was flooded and it would require tons of work to get down to.
2007-03-03 22:18:07 · answer #6 · answered by DPRKLiberator 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
you mean the gas he used to murder thousands of his own people wasn't a weapon of mass destruction? wow.
If we hadn't taken him out, he would have had them eventually. Our only mistake was in not being aggressive enough
2007-03-03 23:07:55 · answer #7 · answered by BobbyR 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
im sorry to say they ever existed mate. not that i wanted them to have WNDs, just that it was all a big scam from the idiotic leaders of america :(
2007-03-03 21:48:35 · answer #8 · answered by . 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋