There are many theories about how the heavenly bodies were created. The Big bang theory so on and so forth. But if you read the Bible(if you are religous or not)you can see in the book of Genisis that God made all the things in the univirse. He alaso made the moon for its purpouse. To light up the world at night....
2007-03-03 10:46:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jane Merencilla 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
There are 4 main evolutionary theories.
None of them stand up to scrutiny.
The moon was created by God on the 4th day.
Fission theory, invented by the astronomer George Darwin (son of Charles). He proposed that the earth spun so fast that a chunk broke off. But this theory is universally discarded today. The earth could never have spun fast enough to throw a moon into orbit, and the escaping moon would have been shattered while within the Roche Limit.
Capture theory — the moon was wandering through the solar system, and was captured by Earth’s gravity. But the chance of two bodies passing close enough is minute; the moon would be more likely to have been ‘slingshotted’ like artificial satellites than captured. Finally, even a successful capture would have resulted in an elongated comet-like orbit.
Condensation theory — the moon grew out of a dust cloud attracted by Earth’s gravity. However, no such cloud could be dense enough, and it doesn’t account for the moon’s low iron content.
Impact theory — the currently fashionable idea that material was blasted off from Earth by the impact of another object. Calculations show that to get enough material to form the moon, the impacting object would need to have been twice as massive as Mars. Then there is the unsolved problem of losing the excess angular momentum.
http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/764
2007-03-05 08:10:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by a Real Truthseeker 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
* The Fission Theory: This theory proposes that the Moon was once part of the Earth and somehow separated from the Earth early in the history of the solar system. The present Pacific Ocean basin is the most popular site for the part of the Earth from which the Moon came. This theory was thought possible since the Moon's composition resembles that of the Earth's mantle and a rapidly spinning Earth could have cast off the Moon from its outer layers. However, the present-day Earth-Moon system should contain "fossil evidence" of this rapid spin and it does not. Also, this hypothesis does not have a natural explanation for the extra baking the lunar material has received.
* The Capture Theory: This theory proposes that the Moon was formed somewhere else in the solar system, and was later captured by the gravitational field of the Earth. The Moon's different chemical composition could be explained if it formed elsewhere in the solar system, however, capture into the Moon's present orbit is very improbable. Something would have to slow it down by just the right amount at just the right time, and scientists are reluctant to believe in such "fine tuning". Also, this hypothesis does not have a natural explanation for the extra baking the lunar material has received.
* The Condensation Theory: This theory proposes that the Moon and the Earth condensed individually from the nebula that formed the solar system, with the Moon formed in orbit around the Earth. However, if the Moon formed in the vicinity of the Earth it should have nearly the same composition. Specifically, it should possess a significant iron core, and it does not. Also, this hypothesis does not have a natural explanation for the extra baking the lunar material has received.
There is one theory which remains to be discussed, and it is widely accepted today.
The Giant Impactor Theory (sometimes called The Ejected Ring Theory): This theory proposes that a planetesimal (or small planet) the size of Mars struck the Earth just after the formation of the solar system, ejecting large volumes of heated material from the outer layers of both objects. A disk of orbiting material was formed, and this matter eventually stuck together to form the Moon in orbit around the Earth. This theory can explain why the Moon is made mostly of rock and how the rock was excessively heated. Furthermore, we see evidence in many places in the solar system that such collisions were common late in the formative stages of the solar system. This theory is discussed further below.
More About The Giant Impactor Theory
In the mid-1970s, scientists proposed the giant impact scenario for the formation of the Moon. The idea was that an off-center impact of a roughly Mars-sized body with a young Earth could provide Earth with its fast initial spin, and eject enough debris into orbit to form the Moon. If the ejected material came primarily from the mantles of the Earth and the impactor, the lack of a sizeable lunar core was easily understood, and the energy of the impact could account for the extra heating of lunar material required by analysis of lunar rock samples obtained by the Apollo astronauts.
For nearly a decade, the giant impact theory was not believed by most scientists. However, in 1984, a conference devoted to lunar origin prompted a critical comparison of the existing theories. The giant impact theory emerged from this conference with nearly consensus support by scientists, enhanced by new models of planet formation that suggested large impacts were actually quite common events in the late stages of terrestrial planet formation.
The basic idea is this: about 4.45 billion years ago, a young planet Earth -- a mere 50 million years old at the time and not the solid object we know today-- experienced the largest impact event of its history. Another planetary body with roughly the mass of Mars had formed nearby with an orbit that placed it on a collision course with Earth. When young Earth and this rogue body collided, the energy involved was 100 million times larger than the much later event believed to have wiped out the dinosaurs. The early giant collision destroyed the rogue body, likely vaporized the upper layers of Earth's mantle, and ejected large amounts of debris into Earth orbit. Our Moon formed from this debris.
artist's drawing of body hitting young earth to form our moon
2007-03-03 11:08:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by slugbug 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
it used to be a part of earth, then around 4.5 billion years ago a huge asteroid collided with earth sending a shower of matter out into orbit around earth, much of this ended up becoming the moon, which is why the moon is relatively poor in the heavier metals, but the materials from the crust and upper mantle are common on the moon.
2007-03-03 11:11:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tim C 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
There is a theory that a chunk of the earth came off, and the moon was born. But the most logical answer for me would be GOD.
2007-03-03 10:59:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Titanic Fan 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
there is a theory that it was part of the earth when the earth was still forming, a huge asteroid landed and broke a chunk of the earth off, and it became the moon. or that it was a piece of space debris that got locked in our system.
2007-03-03 10:42:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by sirdunny 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
See this link for info:
http://www.discover.com/issues/feb-03/features/featmoon/
2007-03-03 10:43:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Polo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
behind the mountains
2007-03-03 10:44:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Peter S 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
mum got it from ice land
2007-03-03 10:41:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Ikea (p32)
2007-03-03 10:40:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋