English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-03 10:30:23 · 19 answers · asked by Luis T 3 in Politics & Government Politics

19 answers

Neither...both have their high and low points, but are far from the greatness of Jefferson, Washington, and Lincoln...

2007-03-03 10:33:08 · answer #1 · answered by number_nine08 1 · 4 1

I wouldn't say Bush is a great president. He hasn't expressed a vision that creates wealth for the planet. He is better than Clinton.

I don't understand how Clinton snowed by so many. He didn't create the great economy. He was manipulated by Arafat. Yes, Reagan enabled him to preside over the military build down. The Internet became economically viable while he was in office. That doesn't mean he had any influence on its creation, financing, or breath. If it wasn't for Newt Gingrich contract with America, Clinton would have taken the added tax revenue to create new entitlements not cut deficits.

Clinton like O.J. Simpson showed there is 2 levels of law - 1 for the Rich & Powerful another for us nobodies.

2007-03-03 11:34:20 · answer #2 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 0 1

Well, Bill Clinton made a valiant attempt to defecate on the Constitution. "When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans... And so a lot of people say there's too much personal freedom. When personal freedom's being abused, you have to move to limit it. That's what we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the public housing projects, about how we're going to have weapon sweeps and more things like that to try to make people safer in their communities." President Bill Clinton, 3-22-94, MTV

"We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans ..." Bill Clinton (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A)


However, George Bush has actually succeeded in taking a catastrophic bowel-movement on our nation's most precious ideals. (Patriot Act)

Bill Clinton allowed the false-flag attack on the Oklahoma City building which killed hundreds of people. However, Bush allowed for the false-flag attack on the pentagon and World Trade Center that kill thousands of people. So, It's really hard to say which one is a bigger scum-bag.

2007-03-03 10:38:08 · answer #3 · answered by jimmyb20032003 2 · 1 1

between the two... Clinton... according to most people

Clinton I think still had like 60 percent approval rating at the end of his term, even after all the craziness...

Bush has been at like 30-40 for a couple of years... with no real sign I see of improvement...

http://www.pollingreport.com/wh.htm

top is Bush, below is a link to Clinton's numbers... and if the difference is that large... there's a reason...

2007-03-03 10:38:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

i presumed Reagan did a sturdy job in helping the economic device restoration by potential of cutting taxes. yet as quickly as the economic device recovered, he did not boost taxes back. Reagan confirmed different Republicans that deficits do not rely. as quickly as Republicans found out this, they went on a borrowing frenzy. whilst George HW Bush became President, he saved borrowing. After he left place of work, that ended 12 years of borrowing. This took the nationwide Debt from $a million trillion to $5 trillion. After the invasion of Kuwait, Bush had 500,000 troops waiting to invade Iraq. it somewhat is 4 circumstances the style of troops we've there now. Why did Bush think of we mandatory such dissimilar extra troops? Clinton had oral intercourse with Monica Lewinsky. He could desire to have been desperate. yet additionally this scandle which saved him from governing the rustic the way he needed, he did stability the funds and did not could desire to touch Social protection. He tried to hold economic duty back. The nationwide Debt replaced into $5.8 trillion with a funds surplus whilst he left the presidency. And whilst Clinton signed the bill that allowed commercial banks and investment banks to merge (the reason in the back of each and all of the banks going below), Congress replaced into controlled by potential of the Republicans. commercial banks making use of depositors money to make questionable investments replaced into the reason in the back of the great melancholy. the version at present's the FDIC. with out them, the recession must be lots worse. George W Bush got here into the White abode and went on holiday. Clinton counseled Bush approximately Bin laden. Bush had earlier warning that Bin laden replaced into making plans a important attack on the U. S.. And whilst 9/11 surpassed off, he replaced into as shocked because of fact the rest people. later on, he at present decrease taxes, spent the Social protection Surplus and greater spending. He sent hundreds of troops to Afghanistan to discover Bin laden with out fulfillment. After 8 years in place of work, the nationwide Debt went from $5.8 trillion to over $10 trillion. George W Bush has have been given to be the worst of those 4 presidents. He is often the worst president interior the historic past of america.

2016-10-17 05:03:45 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Bush is a statesman; Clinton a joke.

2007-03-03 10:51:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

GW is the dumbest; Slick Willie was sharp, but morally corrupt.

Neither president was the best president.

However, the country enjoyed prosperity and reduction of the national debt during the Clinton years.

The Bush years continue to plunge us into deeper debt, with inflation on the rise.

Economically speaking, Clinton had a better impact on our country.

2007-03-03 10:37:39 · answer #7 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 2 4

they both aren't close to the best but Clinton was by far the lesser of two evils, personally i would rather have left his sex life to him and his wife i would rather know exactly why we are in Iraq and what really was happening on 9/11, i guess American lives seem more important then some guys sex life to me.

2007-03-03 10:47:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Don't ya just love how they forget about how we were attacked over and over during Clinton?

2007-03-03 10:39:06 · answer #9 · answered by bugeyes 4 · 1 1

Bush is a murderer and Clinton just likes getting his dick sucked. Its like choosing between Charles Manson and Ron Jeremy!

2007-03-03 10:49:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

I'll take 8 years of peace and prosperity over 7 years of anarchy, chaos and destruction any day.

I could care less about Clinton's infedility - better a ******** than a snow job, and it's been a blizzard of lies and deceit every single second of every single day since the judiciary selected our president for us back in 2000.

2007-03-03 10:35:55 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

fedest.com, questions and answers