How can they now claim that along with Saudi Arabia they will prevent the spread of sectarian conflict? They are one of the main reasons that Democracy has not succeded yet in Iraq.
2007-03-03 10:24:04 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Many people question whether or not Iran is directly involved in supporting Shi'ite militias. The president has zero control of the IRGC and the Guardian Council doesn't have much control over them either. If you ask me, it's a bunch of rogue IRGC members who are giving the Badr Brigades and Mahdi Army weapons. If the Iranians wanted to truly support the Shi'ite militia, then you would see M-1 Abrams tanks being destroyed in Sadr City and US troops getting slaughtered. Plus it would make no sense for Iran to help destablize Iraq. Millions of refugees would be pouring over their border or over Syria's border if there was a civil war. They don't want that. Feeding them would be a pain in the @$$ since they already import 50% of their food and inflation is rising due to Ahmadinejad's economic policies.
2007-03-03 14:23:03 · answer #1 · answered by DPRKLiberator 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iran is the only Shiite Theocracy. As such it is allied to the Shiite majority in Iraq. The "Democracy" we set up is totally dependent on the support of the Shiite majority. That's why the Shiite Prime Minister won't cross Iran or the Mahdi Army. We are the primary aggressors, we serve as tools of the Shiites against the sunni Minority.
When we leave the Prime Minister will hold a Victory Parade in Bagdad. Muqtada al Sadr, the Iranians and Hizb Allah will be in the front row.
2007-03-03 10:36:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The primary aggressors in Iraq are the USA and UK; they illegally invaded a sovereign country that had made not military or other aggressive action toward them. They also acted without specific permission of the UN.
It is alleged that some arms being used by Shia insurgents in Iraq come from Iran, but no one should accept that allegation without considering the less than credible source.
2007-03-03 10:38:32 · answer #3 · answered by P. M 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
and they make damn sure that it never will succeed.
2007-03-04 18:53:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
"Democracy" at gunpoint ha ha ha ha ha
2007-03-03 11:13:11 · answer #5 · answered by K. Marx iii 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋