Do you think she was murdered?
If so, by whom?
There has been a ruling made that a PUBLIC JURY should sit in on the inquest, what do you think the verdict will be?
Although justice is only being sought, should we not let her name rest and just remember all the good she done.
*** TEN POINTS FOR THE BEST ANSWER ***
2007-03-03 10:02:22 · 16 answers · asked by redcar_rebel 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
I have always believed that she was murdered. I also believe that if her name wasn't taken off the V.I .P list she would still be alive today, because she would have been protected as she should have been while she was in Paris, after all she was still the Mother to the heir to the throne namely Wills. And we all no who took her name off don't we ???????.
Yes the Queen { THE ESTABLISHMENT }
Even though she is dead she will always be the Queen of hearts to those that are loyal to her and never to that b***h that Charles has married. How the Queen even allowed him to marry her after what they done to Dianna, is atrocious. I mean by him climbing out of windows to meet with her, poor Dianna never stood a change.
The big question is why did he marry her in the first place, between the two of them they put Dianna through HELL.
He should have just left Dianna alone and waited for the B***h to be free. She will never be able to be the person that Dianna was and she will never be as astoundingly beautiful as Dianna. { not that I'm saying that she has any beauty cause boy she sure is ugly }
Long live the real Queen of this country DIANNA.
Rest in peace we all love you XX
2007-03-04 22:35:23 · answer #1 · answered by pixie 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
A lot of questions to answer in one question! I have always believed that there were plots to get rid of her because the 'Establishment' not only saw her as an embarrassment but didn't like the fact that the whole world loved her. We only get to see and hear what the media portray and we all know that a lot of that is a load of hyped up lies, so can we ever really know? Given the evidence we have been given by the media there are a lot of unexplained incidences and seemingly some cover ups. When there are cover ups then immediately this amounts to rising suspicion. Even though there will be a public jury how do we know that they have not been instructed by the 'powers that be' to return a verdict that will allay all thoughts of a conspiracy? We all know how corrupt the legal system is. Even if it was an accident which killed her I still think that there were conspiracies afoot but the accident saved them from carrying out the unthinkable. Whatever the verdict she is still sorely missed and the world is definitely NOT a better place without her - she is a legend.
2007-03-03 21:50:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Come on leave it alone, accident.
OR
Why is it the only survivor was Diana's bodyguard a member of a certain regiment based in Hereford England(SAS), he was and ( sit up and listen) wearing a seat belt, why was the Fiat Panda never found, why were the photographers never prosecuted, WHY WHY I could go on but lets face it if after ten years, a case that will cost millions (who is paying for it) they still find that it was an accident, will Mr Al Fayid go away?
2007-03-04 20:10:39 · answer #3 · answered by stephen g 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
there was an inquest set to start to decide all questions concerning her death, but on the day it was to start, the royals had it cancelled. That itself displays their power in britain, they stand above the law and above truth, as well as above the social system which they control thru the power to have critics ostracized.
Obviously, like in any divorce case, the thought of killing can occur. If it occurs in the right minds who have sufficient power and money, they can buy one two or dozens of people to carry out their whims u under the pretext of an accident - people working in the bar to drug the drinks, people paid to chase them on motorcycles, knowing how diana hated them and wanted to be free of their attention. Its truth shrouded in the evil of conspiratorial silence.
Some day it will come out. But by then, the responsible conspirators will probably all be dead and nothing will be done to anyone.
Thats how the royals maintain their power and authority. The hapless brits cant fathom or understand it because their brainwashed from infancy to the contrary
2007-03-04 03:06:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Diana was killed in a car accident and the fact that neither she nor Dodi Fayed were wearing seat belts contributed to their deaths.
All the allegations of murder come from Mohammed Fayed who, whilst obviously grieving, has no right to vent his grief by making these disgusting allegations about Prince Charles and Prince Phillip, who cannot answer back.
He obviously had hopes of a marriage but Dodi was just another of the string of lovers that Diana had. From all accounts it was the heart surgeion whom she was keen on.
2007-03-04 06:23:51 · answer #5 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Accident.
Drunk driver,speed, strange streets - basically an accident waiting to happen.
If it happened to anyone other than Princess Diana it would have been accepted as the accident it was years ago.
Ten years is long enough. Time to let it go.
Mohammed Al Fayed has his own axe to grind, which I suspect has very little to do with whether or not it was an accident.
2007-03-04 09:12:56 · answer #6 · answered by monkeyface 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Who knows? She could have been in an accident or she could have been murdered. The best we can do is to weigh all the evidence available and decide. An impartial inquiry has already been carried out and the verdict was that it was an accident.
2007-03-03 23:05:01 · answer #7 · answered by John of shrysostom 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋
In cases previous any royal could in no way were allowed to divorce. fantastically, the spouse of the monarch in waiting and mom to his heir. they could have had to study a thanks to close-up and placed-up with their lot. In Scotland the Royal lady were presented with their own lodging - Linlithgow Palace. If any were daft sufficient to reason disruption or embarrassment to the reigning monarch, then they were transferred to anothe rfortification - Blackness citadel for protecting custody. England had the equivalent contained in the Tower Of London. The gallows or the slicing block became the perfect motel.
2016-12-05 05:02:02 · answer #8 · answered by lesniewski 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
charley made sure that he was the only person to bring back her body to this land,thereby no autopsy,the royals do not care what us ordinary mortals think,they will carry on doing exactly what suits them,as long as they are made an admiral or a general,by the the end of the month.
2007-03-04 06:50:04 · answer #9 · answered by reginald r 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Other members of the royal family have died by accident (Prince Henry of Gloucester. If Diana hadn't been royal, it would have been put down as simply one more car crash and forgotten.
2007-03-04 10:11:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋