English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Nothing scares liberal more than real and honest debate and straight forward logic. If they are forced to play by these rules they can not play in the grey areas that they hold to for protection.

2007-03-03 09:30:14 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Some are asking for examples I decided to give a few. But first let me say that Hitler was not a Catholic. He was raised Catholic but turned to Darwyn and his theory of evolution. Hence his belief that the jews were evolutionarly inferior and that Aryans were the superior race. For some reason liberal educators tend to leave Hitler off of the list of famous supporters of evoltion.

I would like to draw to light the issue of liberals not being able to debate squarely. Take for example whenever we speak about the issue of affirmitive action we are called racists and bigots. Our stance is that racial hiring or admissin preferences for minorities contravene the basic American ideal that all people should be treated equally under the law, the same ideal that inspired the original civil rights movement. Moreover, studies show that these practices in fact demoralize and stigmatize blacks as being somehow in need of special help. These are principled, coherent and democratic ideas.

2007-03-03 10:16:44 · update #1

Yet the only thing we hear are shouts of "racist!" when we present them. Example, Al Gore once gave a speech to the NAACP Convention that embodies the typical liberal response.

"I've heard the critics of affirmitice action, they use their 'color blind' the way duck hunters use a duck blind; the hide behind it and hope the ducks won't notice." He then goes on ask what the reactions of racial-prefernce opponents were to a story about a black man being doused in gasoline and burned alive.

Naturaly this is a horrific event. But leave it up to liberals use it to try and attain support for affirmative action and stereotype conservatives all the while not addressing our charge.

2007-03-03 10:23:14 · update #2

12 answers

alpha male = brilliant!!!!!!!!!!

2007-03-03 09:33:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 6

You're blaming Darwin for the genocide of Jews? Hitler was Catholic then left the church at a young age but he still believed in a Supreme being. Also, he used Luther's book "Jews and their Lies" to mobilize most of German Lutherans to follow him.

"set fire to their synagogues or schools and to bury and cover with dirt whatever will not burn, so that no man will ever again see a stone or cinder of them… I advise that their houses also be razed and destroyed… their prayer books and Talmudic writings, in which such idolatry, lies, cursing and blasphemy are taught, be taken from them… their rabbis be forbidden to teach henceforth on pain of loss of life and limb… that safe-conduct on the highways be abolished completely for the Jews." By Luther

Most his Nazi guards were Lutheran and Hitler never mentioned Darwin in his speeches. I'm not a liberal but I know my history.

2007-03-03 20:25:39 · answer #2 · answered by cynical 6 · 0 0

I'm not a liberal but I'll interject with a question to your question. Why, has Osama Bin Laden not been captured? This is the admitted leader behind 09/11/2001, the day every adult American will never forget.

No I don't like your quote of the day, it's insulting and blatantly false. How do you find the audacity to speak of real and honest debate when you start by insulting the group you are challenging to debate? Not everyone who is not a republican is a liberal.

2007-03-03 17:42:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I understand Hitler was a Catholic and a conservative - after all facisim is the extreme end of the conservative realm isn't it.

Not a word about Hitler being a conservative huh ?

Hitler was in pretty deep with a fairly coopertive pope and his regime was pro Catholic - sybolisim of it was rife within it. I suppose the pro Nazi government in America at the time shapes some views of Hitler still in America where Joe Kennedy was more than open of his support - Funny Bush has used many of the same tactics in gaining power for his invasions and tinkering with the fundemental rights of his people - I guess reviseing history for the "New Order" couldn't be far behind -
So if Iraq = the Rhine will Iran = Poland ?

2007-03-03 17:34:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6 5

Yes, I like it. It certainly fits Hillary Clinton.

2007-03-03 17:54:06 · answer #5 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 1 0

I have seen neither honest debate or straight forward logic from the right. What I do see is begging the question, strawman arguments, arguments from personal experience, and flat out avoidance of straight forward questions. So my answer is no, I don't agree with it.

2007-03-03 17:42:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

Amazing that logic.... Democrats rule the school there ...buster!

Many Americans must agree with Democrats they voted for them!

2007-03-03 17:36:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

And, your point?

You're spewing hate, without any real substance. Give examples to back up your contention, if you dare...

2007-03-03 17:34:41 · answer #8 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 7 1

Hey Trout,so swing all the way to the left and you have your commie heroes (like Stalin ,Pol Pot).

2007-03-03 17:37:59 · answer #9 · answered by bugeyes 4 · 1 3

why don't you just admit your a liberal?

2007-03-03 17:33:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

yup. you forgot to have accountability for their positions.

2007-03-03 17:35:21 · answer #11 · answered by uab_skinhead 3 · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers