I would be getting Ryan Howard, Carlos Lee, and Stephen Drew....for Hanley Ramirez, Paul Konerko, Alex Rios, and Josh Willingham. It was accpeted by the person i traded to, but vetoed by the league. what do you guys think? fair or not and why?
2007-03-03 08:37:41 · 8 answers · asked by Shone 1 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
I'd say that's pretty fair. Howard is a bit better than Konerko and Lee is a bit better than Rios. But Drew is going to better than Ramirez. Either side isn't getting a bad side of the trade. The others in your league wouldn't let it go through probably because they are being bitter bhitches and want to screw up a trade thats going to destroy them.
2007-03-03 08:50:00 · answer #1 · answered by joethemetaldude 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Howard and Lee are obviously 2 very good power hitters. Ramirez provides avg. and SBs. Konerko is a replacement for power, and Rios can be the all around guy on the fantasy team that puts ur team ahead of evry1 else, if the rest of your team is balanced. As for Willingham, heel provide decent depth, so will Stephen Drew.
Peace
2007-03-03 08:43:47 · answer #2 · answered by redsoxbrett 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
honest commerce is achieved while countries commerce with one yet another autonomously. loose commerce is comparable, however the lack of ability of fairness is generally attributed to a minimum of one/3 events like the WTO. interior the top, the weaker countries get exploited. stressful to charm to the line between the two so genuinely, yet an occasion of loose commerce that may not honest is Nike. Nike company runs production plant life in southeast Asian and latin American countries. the corporate place of work pushes the administration for such unreasonable earnings that the persons generally make approximately $a million.50 or much less an afternoon, it rather is sufficient to stay to tell the tale on nutrition yet no longer the rest. countries can commerce autonomously mutually as nevertheless benefitting the smaller countries by skill of setting up rules that limit their multinational companies from violating particular rules like pay standards. there is not any choose for a 0.33 social gathering if the greater desirable government is responsible. regrettably, that's no longer the case. The WTO does not have the smaller countries appropriate hobbies in thoughts, the two. it fairly is totally uncomfortable to think of basically how a lot of people stay unfavorable lives so as that we could desire to consistently purchase products at "good" expenditures.
2016-09-30 03:57:27 · answer #3 · answered by guyden 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not fair because ryan howard and carlos lee are worth more than the guys on the other team
2007-03-03 08:40:34 · answer #4 · answered by BaSeBaLlKiD721 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL - don't pick on the handicapped players... They are not going to let you have a first and second round pick without you giving up at least your first round pick.. I would say with what you were giving up you probably have A-Rod, Soriano or Santana as well. No way would 10 other guys let you have that.
2007-03-03 09:11:45 · answer #5 · answered by EnormusJ69 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
thats not even close to being fair. you are getting a first and second round pick for some middle tier players. im surprised the other person accepted
2007-03-03 11:16:54 · answer #6 · answered by Circlometry™³ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if I myself would accept it, but I don't think that it is veto material.
2007-03-03 10:21:55 · answer #7 · answered by cowsvils 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not fair
2007-03-03 08:44:59 · answer #8 · answered by sunnydays 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋