Please, honest answers only
2007-03-03 08:25:01 · 24 answers · asked by Taco 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
CLINTON all the way..i insist on having a teacher at least marginally smarter than my kids, and with GW, its too close to call~~~
2007-03-03 08:29:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
Please examine the form. Article I, section 9, paragraph 7. The Congress has the only skill of the pursestrings. The GOP Congress compelled a balanced budget on Clinton and overrode his VETO, finally forcing him to settle for it, after he threw quite a few public hissy suits, even going so a good distance as to close down the federal government in a snit. Clinton and the Democrats NOW take credit for something that they FOUGHT like demons. yet another Democratic LIE. Ronald Reagan sent 8 balanced budgets to Congress which Democratic Speaker of the domicile Tip O'Neill stated "ineffective on Arrival." The DEMOCRATIC domicile and Senate then proceeded to spend the rustic deep into debt, inspite of the vast enhance in federal gross revenues generated by skill of the Reagan tax cuts. in case you supply the Democrats ONE greenback, they spend 3. back, yet another Democratic LIE. George W. Bush's refusal to veto spending and refusal of the GOP Congress to rein in government is the main reason they many Republicans are disgusted with them. we are isolating ourselves from that and helping McCain and Palin. McCain and Palin the two have long histories as economic conservatives. Obama has an fairly shaky and short record and it fairly is all tax and spend. Biden is a tax and spend liberal - has been for 30+ years. look on the record!!!! it could desire to no longer be greater sparkling!!!! in case you care approximately economic accountability, you have basically one determination in this election. McCain/Palin - for real economic reform.
2016-09-30 03:55:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as it's not a girl's high school class, Clinton. He's intelligent and articulate, with a well rounded education. Mr. Bush often seems lost for words and a little confused.
2007-03-03 08:29:38 · answer #3 · answered by Holly R 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, let me see. If these guys are teaching, they should be teaching what they are good at. That means Bush would be teaching how to make senseless, illogical decisions and kill our own troops. And then he would also explain how to become an illegal president.
I think I will go for Clinton.
2007-03-03 08:56:42 · answer #4 · answered by ramshi 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bill Clinton.
2007-03-03 08:29:17 · answer #5 · answered by cynical 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Bush!!! What Clinton has to teach, children don't need to hear.
2007-03-03 08:34:54 · answer #6 · answered by TJ815 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Gee... now that I think more about your question, it's a scary thought to have either teach my kids. If I pick George, my kids will be incoherent speakers and will likely be ego-centric and fearful of the world. If I pick Bill, by the time they get into high school, they will probably be molested or at least had an advance from Slick Willy.
So, in conclusion, integrity and intelligence, thine name ain't el presidente.
2007-03-03 08:30:28 · answer #7 · answered by J G 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Neither. Both would bore my son to sleep. Children need teachers, and neither one of these men have held themselves out as teachers.
A guest visit to read a book? Sure, either one.
On the other hand, if I thought Bush really would return the "board of education" to the class-room, I'd be 100% in favor of that.
2007-03-03 08:40:00 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Bill Clinton of course.
I know you ask this question because of Monica, but, how can you be sure GWB had ever had a BJ
2007-03-03 08:39:42 · answer #9 · answered by QQ dri lu 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
if we are talking about teaching a class about preventing my daughter from becoming a victim of a stalker, bill clinton hands down...i always go for the proffesional advice....lol
2007-03-03 08:28:49 · answer #10 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋