English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1 why does ecw suck so much?
2 which is better (not counting wwe) tna,wsx,or ecw?

a non wrestling question
what ever happened to mickie james #1 fan aka mickie lee

2007-03-03 06:38:06 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

she didnt have what?

2007-03-03 06:43:09 · update #1

7 answers

1: b/c they think they're so hardcore but they're really not and the only good wreslter on ecw is the sand man amd he should go to raw and get some real fans
2: none of them are good except for RAW then second smackdown...but secretly vince owns ecw and probably tna which would make them part of wwe but thts under the hush hush right now moving on to number
3:i dunno i read from her answer her computer broke or something like tht

2007-03-03 07:09:37 · answer #1 · answered by ♥~Jeff Hardy's babe~♥ 3 · 0 0

1. ECW sucks because McMahon pretty much dismantle everything that was good about ECW. ECW wasn't about traditional wrestling, it was about how much violence each wrestler can inflict on each other. McMahon pretty much limits what the ECW wrestlers can do. McMahon knows nothing about ECW, and when Paul Heyman resigned or got fired, ECW went to hell in a hand basket.

Also, ECW is considered 3rd class behind RAW and Smackdown, so ECW doesn't have a lot of superstars that RAW and Smackdown has. All the top Superstars from ECW gets moved to RAW or SD. RVD is the exception, but I think he's in ECW more as a punishment than anything else. There's talk that CM Punk (who's one of the better ECW wrestlers) might be heading over to RAW. ECW also gets 1 hour show, while RAW and SD gets 2 hours.

2. I think TNA is better than the other 2. For that matter, I think TNA is better than RAW.

No idea what happened to Mickie Lee. Maybe she got called to OVW or her nemesis beat her up? They're only 5 houses apart from each other, so it's easy for them to run into each other.

2007-03-03 14:48:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

before ECW went under originally it was great wrestling. But now its all show and bs I rarely watch it.

2. TNA has some great talent but concerned for where its going if they do it right it will become #1.

3 don't know.

2007-03-03 14:52:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1. The ECW champ is Lashley and he is what true ECW is not.

2. imo they all suck. TNA gets my vote as they've got Angle and Captain Charisma.

3. Who cares!

...mouthpiece...

2007-03-03 14:44:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1 because the original ecw was better and mr McMahon ruined it
2 TNA...TNA...TNA...TNA

2007-03-03 20:24:21 · answer #5 · answered by STEENILIZER!!! 3 · 0 0

1. it does not
2ecw
3. she didn't have one

2007-03-03 14:41:35 · answer #6 · answered by ................................ 2 · 0 0

hey im at my friends house! MY COMPUTER CRASHED SO I WONT BE ON FOR A WHIE=LE AND MY EMAIL AINT WORKING SO YEAH....

2007-03-03 14:45:53 · answer #7 · answered by MICKIE JAMES #1 FAN (Mickie Lee) 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers