English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

No. You are not alone. Seriously BORRRRING !

Here is what one newspaper critic wrote:

The Charlotte Observer
Published: Friday, October 20, 2006

After seeing Sofia Coppola's "Marie Antoinette," I realize there was no need for the bloodshed and turmoil of the French Revolution that made Marie and husband Louis XVI shorter by a head. Had the mobs left them alone, they'd have bored themselves and everyone else in the aristocracy to death.

And I no longer think the French people who booed this movie at the Cannes Film Festival were reacting to the trivialization of their past or a false understanding of history, though "Antoinette" reeks of both. They were just reacting to a film that's tolerable only when the characters don't open their mouths.

2007-03-03 06:45:23 · answer #1 · answered by JOHN B 6 · 0 0

Being a History fan as I am...I didn't like it, I didn't think it was lame, but I thought that they tried to portray her as a victim of circumstance rather than as a cause of her own demise.
Loved the costumes though...and all those scenes at the Petit Trianon were great.

2007-03-03 15:36:18 · answer #2 · answered by White 7 · 0 0

it wasn't that good. i liked the costumes a lot though.

2007-03-03 14:39:12 · answer #3 · answered by mbs4174 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers