2007-03-03 06:35:04 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Let me clarify something. Bill Clinton, nor any other US citizen, can't be Secretary General as Nationals (citizens) of the five permanent members of the Security Council (ie US, UK, Russian Federation, China & France) are not permitted (as opposed to the 10 rotating members). It's usually someone from a "middle power" country on a regional rotating basis. Currently, it's Asia's turn. Therefore, Clinton would be unable to appoint Gore to anything. That wouldn't mean that Gore couldn't get some sort of other post in his own right some other route.
2007-03-03 07:13:31 · answer #1 · answered by rempelhg 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nothing. People do not understand that Al Gore and Clinton had a falling out during his second term. Al thought that Clinton was surrounding himself with too much scandal and was not being an effective President. That is why he tried to distance himself away from Clinton in his campaign in 2000. He also thought that Clinton was not being loyal to the Democratic party was he was giving in too much to the Republican controlled Congress by signing the NAFTA deal and backing China into the WTO.
Hilary and Bill would not appoint Gore to anything.
2007-03-03 06:44:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all that is not going to happen. The UN just got a new Secretary General, why would they want another one so soon?
Why would he appoint Al Gore to anything? Gore might be President of the US by then and wouldn't want to have a UN post.
2007-03-03 06:43:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bill Clinton cannot become the UN Secretary General because he's a US Citizen and the US is a permanent member of the Security Council. No member or citizen who's country is a member of the Security Council can become the Secretary General.
Tax the poor !!!
2007-03-03 06:47:12 · answer #4 · answered by Scorpius 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that Bill Clinton becoming Secretart General of the UN is about as likely as Monica Lewinsky being canonized as a Saint.
2007-03-03 06:41:28 · answer #5 · answered by silvcslt 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the subject is now no longer bill. that's what Hillary has in her mouth... undesirable techniques and customary trash talk. She is dropping and it and that's killing her i'm advantageous. yet she could desire to have understand that once her wellbeing-care did no longer paintings while bill replaced into in place of work! So she tries it back???? She has been a poser as a senator, balloting on little or no substantial legislations. She and Obama are ghosting each and each others votes to make advantageous they get the spin on one yet another. Pitiful, and the standard public is catching on. Oh yeah, and scandals, I forgot. Al Gore? he's in simple terms a dope. how are you able to do a documentary without info? He could desire to have taken Michael Moore's class.
2016-10-02 08:01:51 · answer #6 · answered by pienkowski 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seeing as they don't appear to be the best of friends, probably nothing. With the popularity of the global warming buzz right now and Al Gore having made himself the guru of the movement, there might be something in that area for him. It would probably be a popular move, and those are the ones they go for.
2007-03-03 06:40:54 · answer #7 · answered by PJPeach 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe he can - as the SecGen cannot come from the nations of the Security Council - thought I heard that somewhere
2007-03-03 06:38:01 · answer #8 · answered by tomkat1528 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If Hillary is prez., and bill over UN. Find a cave it's all over!
2007-03-03 07:53:28 · answer #9 · answered by Ivan S 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Light bulb changer.
2007-03-03 06:47:30 · answer #10 · answered by Got a light Leo? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋