I would have to be convinced of the person's ideals and I would have to agree with at least some of the candidate's policies before signing.
Great idea in theory. The problem is that in the USA we have 51 separate elections for President so there would be 51 ballots to get onto. That is the problem that "third parties" have.
2007-03-03 06:39:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by skip 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on what you mean by "average". Dictator Dumbya is WELL BELOW average in intellect and the "vision thing" but he has the support of the right wing super rich through his family. No way would a hypothetical George Walker get near the White House if he was the Texas trailer trash he otherwise would be without his family. The background that is most likely to be successful is an intellectually gifted person from humble beginnings who rises by his/her own efforts to at least moderate success and with the character not to forget where s/he came from.
2007-03-03 06:50:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
i have not in any respect attended a "Tea celebration" function, yet from what I listen, they're extra like the "napping significant" that the eastern generic/Admiral(in spite of) become relating, after Pearl Harbor become bombed. The lunatics on the left elected an fool with out values, and no journey, merely because they were P'oed at Bush, AND/or because they were frightened of being categorized a "racist", in the journey that they did not. Cowards continually do the incorrect element, for the incorrect reason. So, listed right here are the traits that i'm searching for in a Candidate. someone who will attack the unlawful Alien challenge. implement the Immigration guidelines, and far of the "economic burdens" on the States, and the rustic, bypass away. they're the source of the State funds shortfalls, with a proper "domino result". someone who believes contained in the truths behind the understanding of our structure. someone with protection force journey, better than nationwide shield, or ROTC pansies. someone who's conscious of the risks, and would make the demanding selections, that the common Liberal is to pansy-@$$ed to make. not in any respect yet another Democrat! ideally a Republican. yet when a fantastic self reliant IS carrying the "will of the people", i ought to bypass there.
2016-11-27 19:09:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would so vote for an outsider because rebubican or not it takes a person outside the politcial box to see what needs to be done and when i think we should get some east texas people to run because they are just crazy enough to know how to run this country
2007-03-03 06:50:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i know a lot of average people who would do much much better jobs than any in our recent past, and most in our entire past...
but in light of general political and voting strategy, we really can't afford to compromise our vote to someone who cannot possibly win, splitting votes within partisan candidates thereby giving the election to the opposition.
that's why voting is choosing the lesser of two evils.
2007-03-03 06:43:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by alex l 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
youhave not researched this very well
almost all presidents are of the charlemagne blood line they are all related genetically and connected with European royalty
only people who belong to the same blood line have become presidents
look it up
bloodlines of the illuminati by David Icke
the presidency is a clan thing
and this goes for all the colonies.
the elections are circusses for the sake of ther gulable public
2007-03-03 06:41:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The ony way people are elected is because of MONEY! The richer, the better. Bush had the most expensive campaign.
2007-03-03 06:37:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tom 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
we already have an average person as president, it's not working out well
2007-03-03 07:09:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Nick F 6
·
1⤊
1⤋