2007-03-03 06:21:29 · 7 answers · asked by biggest_chicagobulls_fan 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
My husband loves me and I love him but there is no conclusive proof of love. No scientific evidence.
2007-03-03 06:26:26 · answer #1 · answered by dtwladyhawk 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are proven facts - If I don't go to work - I will lose my job. If I take a bath and blow dry my hair at the same time and drop my blow dryer I won't be around to impart anymore knowledge. With certain knowledge we have power. However as a human being I know no one has all the right answers and throughout time many theories have been wrong so it's important not to become jaded by what is considered "conclusive proof" otherwise there would be no more invention or discoveries.
2007-03-03 06:57:18 · answer #2 · answered by doe 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The question contains a fallacy. It asks for a universe of discourse with the term "conclusive", an absolute, abstract term which will always lead to circular reasoning and/or a paradox.
2007-03-03 08:23:23 · answer #3 · answered by Sophist 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No: That is why we are on this planet to learn different things. if we had conclusive proof that everything was as it seems..hmm how booring. We need to think for ourselves and make our own judgements based on several factors and there is not always conclusive proof. Before technology could you see your brain..No..bur you had one...
2007-03-03 06:36:00 · answer #4 · answered by commonsense2265 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Glory be and behold, Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems. while considering that, apart from the ascetic ideal, man—the animal, man—had no meaning hitherto. his existence on earth had no goal. "why have man at all?" was a question without an answer...the ascetic ideal offered mankind meaning...that hatred against everything human, even more, against everything animal, everything material, this disgust with the senses, with reason itself, this fear of happiness and beauty, this desire to get away from all semblance, change, becoming, death, wish, desire itself—the meaning of all this, should we dare to comprehend it, is a will to nothingness, a will running counter to life, a revolt against the most fundamental presuppositions of life; yet it is and remains a will! and, to repeat...rather than want nothing, man even wants nothingness. lest ye shall not forget, i am a north wind to ripe figs.
2007-03-03 06:38:48 · answer #5 · answered by mezizany 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. You can know something without proof. Who is to say the proof makes it true and not just a theory?
2007-03-05 10:43:47 · answer #6 · answered by just me 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For scientific facts, yes. But for common-sense things, no.
2007-03-03 06:56:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋