So, what falsehoods about liberalism have Rush and O'Reilly and Ann Coulter told you cons lately?

Question

Like what rumors and hideous personal attacks against liberals have you witnessed recently?
There has got to be something, they are known for these things.

Yeah firestorm, it is easy to dismiss everything you hear as a lie. It's what you cons do because you are too lazy to do our research.

Gary b, liberals have NEVER said any of those things.

Here, you cons might enjoy watching O'Reilly yell at everyone he can think of:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IU9SDYuChsI

Answer 1

Don’t you know, Intriguing, liberals are gay terrorists who hate America, babies, and freedom.

There's a couple of things I have to address. First off: O’Reilly. O’Reilly called our war heroes cold-blooded murderers. He was told he was wrong about Malmedy, he refused to apologize, and called them names again. So, basically, he lied about our troops, not once, but twice, and refused to apologize. He also called General Clark a liar when Clark tried to correct him and basically said he knew better than Clark. So, I guess all the wars Clark has been through and all the medals Clark has received don’t mean nothing compared to the magnificent O’Reilly. I don’t know about some people but I know I don’t want someone who hates our troops as much as O’Reilly does to be in any kind of power, especially the presidential kind.

Next: Ann Coulter. She loves to lie through her endnotes and footnotes. For example, in her book Slander, a big fat one is on page 12. She says Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is called a “’colored lawn jockey for conservative white interests’, ‘race traitor’, ‘black snake’, ‘chicken-and-biscuit-eating Uncle Tom,’ ‘house *****’, and ‘handkerchief head’, ‘Benedict Arnold’ and ‘Judas Iscariot’” by the New York Times. But did they? Nope. If you go to her endnotes you will find out that the quotes came from a Playboy interview with former SG Joycelyn Elders and from a black leader at a meeting of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference who was quoted in The New Yorker. She lies in her endnotes quite a lot, actually. I dare you Coulter lovers to compare what it says in her book to her endnotes.
Another example, this one from her footnotes is when she says “For decades, The New York Times had allowed loose associations between Nazis and Christians to be made in its pages. Statements like these were not uncommon: “Did the Nazi crimes draw on Christian tradition?”….”the church is ‘co-responsible’ for the holocaust…”. The first quote is from a 2001 book review. Paul Berman was framing the question asked by the book he was reviewing, which was about a 400 year old play performed annually in Bavaria that portrays Jews as hateful and evil. The second quote is a quote of a quote from a 1998 Times article, “John Paul’s Jewish Dilemma.” The writer is quoting a critic of the church. In the same article, a Jewish historian is also quoted saying that “[Pope] Pius saved 750,000 Jews.”

And I could go on and on with lies that they have told. For those who don’t believe, it’s called RESEARCH. And not the flimsy kind and believing what is on the internet. Actual research. And for those who give me a thumb’s down, I have only one thing to say: And you say liberals can’t handle the truth.

Answer 2

The lies and falsehoods mostly come from the left. And the left always attacks the messenger instead of the message because they have no contradiction to the message!
Ann Coulter almost always adds footnotes showing WHERE she got the Liberal quotes and the information she writes in her books. Liberals are NEVER able to refute what she writes, so they attack her. Ann did not add footnotes to "How to talk to a Liberal (if you really must)" because the book was mostly compiled from her columns. What really ticks you people off is that she quotes Liberals when they say stupid stuff and points out the ridiculous positions taken by Liberals.

Answer 3

worry is an evolutionary habit conditioned into clever existence. without worry, animals does not comprehend the forthcoming threat of a predator or different aggressive animal. With too lots worry, animals does not be waiting to cool down for a perfect meal without being spooked by potential of something. So, to respond to your question, worry is an exceedingly organic, environmentally-conditioned reaction to stimuli.

Answer 4

Oh! Here's one on Coulter! She believed Canada sent troops to Vietnam. In fact, she was arguing with the Canadian interviewer about it:
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/video_player.html?coulter_clip

Answer 5

Well, I think as far as O'Reilly goes, you should listen up, as far as I'm concerned he is the kind of man that should be our President. You haven't been listening to him or you can't distinguish facts from fiction....or you would be smart enough to wish you had even half his brains.
Bet I'll get a best answer for this, huh?

Answer 6

Well, considering I don't listen to Rush Limbaugh or Anne Coulter, no falsehoods. I don't need them anyhow. You see, everything I need to know about you lunatic lefties, I hear from... YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hellooo.... I do my research. And I'm not just talking about the blatent falshoods and conpiracy BS you lunatic leftists like to throw around.

Answer 7

What planet are you from?? Oh I know, you came down from calypso louies "space wheel"!! Right?
I listen to them, then I DO, do my own research. 97.64637% Of what they say is the truth.
Unlike when I here air america, or shillary clinton. Then it's about .3647583% that is truth.

Answer 8

Let' see,Like their is no illegal immigrant problem,terrorists are not spawned in the Middle East,a socialized america is a good america,Ted Kennedy would be a great President!!!

Answer 9

I only hear the truth. That the men are just hiding behind their women's political views just to get laid.

Answer 10

Nothing... they've just been stating the truth... as usual.

Tax the poor !!!