Does not the JUDICIAL DISPENSATION of a nation be drastically reformed if found ....?

Question

Primitive, Stale, Irrational, Despotic, Less responsive. Adjournment Oriented, Overbearing, Snail-slow, Insensitive, Arbitrary, Corruption ridden, Litigant- hostile, Politically oriented, Government manipulated, Stagnant and blind to Realities, Natural Justice and Professional misconduct, does not such an unworthy dispensation call for urgent reform in the interest of the nation and its people? Any dissent?

Answer 1

What does it mean by dispensation? Dispensation is defined as Religious System prevalent at a particular time. It is a management system entrusted to a church. Judiciary cannot deviate from an established law prevalent for dispensation of justice. What is needed is judicial reform. Indian judiciary is independent and works within the frame work of law. It follows strictly according to evidence submitted. If it is primitive and stale, it is for the law makers, that is Parliament members, to bring about a change. Professional misconduct is observed only in the lower level of judiciary. It is not stagnant and blind to realities, it works but the lawyers put forward illogical arguments and seek adjournment a number of time for selfish goal. Our law is clear but the mind set of the people should change. Without judicial activism, we should have become passive spectators of unhealthy trend in our political system. I have full faith in the judiciary, while the lawyers are liars.

Answer 2

DEPENDS ON WHO IS EVALUATING AND WANTING TO CHANGE.