To push a independent renewable energy agenda???
2007-03-03 05:33:11 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Is Global Warming becoming more of a distraction than it's actually helping?? In other words..
2007-03-03 05:40:25 · update #1
Just prove that there is global warming first, will yea?
2007-03-03 05:38:35 · answer #1 · answered by Sgt 524 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I have nothing against alternative energy, as long as it is funded by corporations and not taxes.
Until a Global Warming debate is held and Global Warming is proven conclusively (as I don't believe it would be), I won't support Kyoto or any other Government reaction to Global Warming.
How can we accept Global Warming when scientists have never even proven that Global Warming is likely caused by human action? The level of Global Warming that does exist, if any, is probably beneficial anyway. They need to prove their theory if they want to hurt our economy to stop it.
2007-03-03 14:28:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm all for energy independence, and I'm all for finding clean, renewable sources of energy, but man-made global warming is a crock that is not backed by real science. It should not be a part of the debate.
Edit: Yes, it's an un-needed distraction.
2007-03-03 13:37:33 · answer #3 · answered by Firestorm 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Global warming is a bunch of bull. Even Al Gore doesn't believe in it, or he wouldn't be flying all over the country in his big jets, and he wouldn't own several big mansions. It's a complete crock. I agree though, we do need to be independent when it comes to energy. It's kind of hard though when the Libs don't want to drill, because of a flippin worm in the ground.
2007-03-03 13:42:54 · answer #4 · answered by ks 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm glad global warming is gettint the attention it is, this new scrutiny is going to shake out the nonsense and get to the real science....whatever it is.
2007-03-03 14:37:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not only is it a crock!!! Global warming is a phenomenon that has cycled for hundreds of thousands of years without CO2,and emissions coming out of my "Hummer"
2007-03-03 13:40:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If it can't survive in the free market, it doesn't deserve to be pushed.
That said, I think Bio-diesel and ether both have promise. Perhaps if the government quit paying farmers to leave ground dormant, we could use the surplus grain for these experiments.
2007-03-03 13:39:19 · answer #7 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm still working on global cooling.
2007-03-03 13:39:51 · answer #8 · answered by tabs 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋