English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Coulter is a featured speaker at the 34th annual Conservative Political Action Conference. Some of the attendees include Governor Mitt Romney, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-CO), Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS) and former Congressman Duncan Hunter (R-CA). Vice President Dick Cheney also attended the event.

Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney spoke before Coulter saying, ““I am happy to hear that after you hear from me, you will hear from Ann Coulter. That is a good thing.”

After she used the f@ggot word in a veiled but very clear reference to John Edwards, the audience applauded and cheered.

Is it right for republicans and their presidential candidates to cheer such hateful and despicable character assassination?

2007-03-03 05:20:36 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

It's all here in black and white;

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/03/03/cpac/
.

2007-03-03 05:40:22 · update #1

12 answers

What amazed me is not so much what she said, (I've known for some time she's a b@tch on wheels who could swallow boiling water and p*ss ice cubes), it was the elated and cheering reaction she got when she said it. The unfortunate thing is that it will not change anyones opinion. Those who hate her will continue to do so, and those that love her truly feel the same way she does anyway, and will continue to love her. It's a real shame that more of America doesn't see this new brand of the Republican party for what it is....biggoted, entitled, elitest, self serving jackasses.

As an aside, am I the only guy who doesn't find her hot????? I think she looks like John Kerry with T*tties.

2007-03-03 16:15:26 · answer #1 · answered by gimli_1977 3 · 2 0

Wow, I don't know if I've ever seen a more vicious and bitter human being than Ann Coulter. If she is looked to as a moral beacon by the right, then they are closer to the party of Musollini than I even expected.

2007-03-03 10:06:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

ny is conventional as "ny" because of the fact some time past a typical human beings hero (Johnny Appleseed) planted a single seed interior the direction of the city. Then, in a wierd warp in area-time, a boy named Jack planted a seed he believed to be magical interior the comparable spot. In what continues to be seen a marveling organic and organic progression, the two seeds fused jointly on a molecular point. After an stunning rain, the seed hybrid grew into an apple 300ft tall and approximatively 330ft extensive. The strangest component being the absence of a tree. it style of feels the apple became thoroughly typical, different than it grew right now from the floor with its own roots like a beanstalk of a few variety. for some years yet to return, human beings might bypass to the city and look up on the impossible fruit and think of "it fairly is a super apple". After a whilst human beings began concerning the city itself as "ny". yet then, 1943 Oct eleventh, something unusual got here approximately. because of the fact the city laid to take a seat down back, the evening as quickly as returned upon them, there became a superb flash of pink gentle. The flash lasted for almost 4-5 seconds. no person is definite what led to the flash, yet as quickly because it became over the apple had in basic terms disappeared. not purely had it vanished, the floor it had grown from had closed as though it have been on no account there. some say the apple had grown so super it created some style of fruity supernova and collapsed in on itself in a black hollow. some say the extraterrestrial beings to blame for the dying of the dinosaurs got here returned and destroyed the apple besides. We might on no account comprehend precisely what got here approximately that evening, yet one component is for confident. That became a super-*** apple.

2016-10-17 04:35:20 · answer #3 · answered by tonini 4 · 0 0

I vote conservative on 75% of issues and 25% more liberal leaning. I think that Ann Coulter is a nightmare. She never shuts her mouth and it is always something vial coming out of there. She has this essence of hate and judgment about everything. I wont listen to her or Rush L. any more. They never report any news that they haven't tainted with propaganda and hate.

2007-03-03 05:41:52 · answer #4 · answered by Mother 6 · 3 0

when havent the re-pugs labeled somebody that they dont argee with!
if you dont support the war,your a terrorist.
if you cut off funding for the war ,your helping the enemy.
dont support the patriot act your a terrorist.
dont believe in torture your a democrat.
dont blindly follow the president your helping the enemy.
if you decent your a terrorist.
if you question the president your a terrorist.

how sick and pathetic are the re-pugs?

2007-03-03 05:41:48 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 2 0

She, like them, are 3D...dumb, desperate and derogatory and just proved it. Politics is a blood sport for them.
It isn't going to work because people are smarter than this group gives them credit for. There is no leadership here.

2007-03-04 00:45:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Coulter has NO CREDIBILITY after smearing lin troop familes wifes
truth is she is treasonous
with her anti troop family remarks

2007-03-03 05:45:11 · answer #7 · answered by impeachbushnoww 1 · 1 0

LOL, Hmmm I wasn't there but, I don't think I'll believe your lefty report.

Ann is crude, she is also correct a lot of the time. She doesn't suffer liberals well. It is hard to do.

2007-03-03 05:36:39 · answer #8 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 1 2

Tell me, Libby. Are you outraged that Murtha, and John Kerry calls our troops terrorists, and stupid?

2007-03-03 05:51:44 · answer #9 · answered by ks 5 · 0 1

Go ahead and use your big-C right to be MORALLY outraged. It is called free speech. Feel free to applaud all the gays you wish.

2007-03-03 05:36:05 · answer #10 · answered by ? 2 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers