Is Tancredo the candidate the conservatives have been looking for?

Question

He has a great voting record on issues,he is against illegal immigration and wants to do something about it and not give amnesty.He defends the border patrol,and the list goes on with other conservative issues.Why compromise with Guiliani who is too liberal with other issues,ie gay rights and abortion?

I meant gay marriage,not gay rights,sorry.

Answer 1

I'd vote for him. Tancredo, as well as Ron Paul and Duncan Hunter, have a strong stance on illegal immigration. I'm a moderate libertarian and I think that we need to secure our borders. I've been promoting the possibility of Tancredo and Paul running together on a unity ticket for the Libertarian and Constitution parties. I may not agree with him on some issues but I'm willing to vote for someone who wants to stop illegals invading our country and he's a good candidate (he's with Paul on the same committee for immigration affairs). Thanks!

Answer 2

First off I still do not understand the rights OBSESSION with gay marriage,to do what "protect the sanctity of marriage"LMAO!!! Other than that I think Tancredo would be a great candidate,a true conservative except for one or two minor blemishes,which includes stances against "gay rights" We can discuss that another day,suffice it to say many conservatives don't even know what the word means anymore,instead it's been turned into a religious slogan. Tancredo however doesn't stand a snowballs chance in Hell since he has been betrayed by the majority of the legislative branch and so he and others who stand up for our laws where immigration is concerned have now been labeled as racist by the majority of the uninformed public.

AD

Answer 3

Tancerdo runs he wont make it to nomination because the republicans lost because of hardline immigration stances in some districts. Immigration reform is needed easily, and answer is complicated, and also you cant merely deport 12 million people like Ike did decrease back contained in the Fifties because society is lot extra complicated, and eliminating 12 million will result 50 plus thousands and thousands people that artwork mutually with them daily, and some married, and performance close freindships with those people. also, certain they did spoil guidelines, and not in any respect keep on with guidelines. someone who's a immigration criminal specialist will inform you the immigration regulation are complicated, and guidelines contained in the books does no longer deal with the migrant flows from Mexico it not in any respect did. If 911 not in any respect occured the issuse would of been resolved, Fox and Bush would of worked something out to both reward. quite, were making mountians out of molehills now right here. Anmesty, should be reported very last, yet first must be customer worker software, yet with guidelines like no vote casting, no loose facilities. Tom Tercedo makes getting to the answer more durable, even as Jeff Flake, Ted Kennedy make getting to the answer it truly is extra reasonable, and bigger off for the destiny.

Answer 4

Tancredo is essentially a one trick pony running to bring attention to illegal immegration. He's highly unlikely to go anywhere in the primary. I wouldn't be surprised if conservatives don't ultimately rally around someone more conservative than the three current frontrunners, but I don't know who that person is yet.

Oh, and for the record I'm a Democrat.

Answer 5

I like Tom and would vote for him in a heart beat. However, I doubt he can ever win. Same thing for Mitt Romney.

I will have to compromise to get a better candidate that can beat Hillary, Edwards, Gore or Obama. I'd vote for Rudy.

Answer 6

Seems like a one trick pony at this point, all immigration all the time.

So, Nope wouldn't vote for him.

Not likely he is gonna win the nomination anyway.

Answer 7

I'd vote for him
The one I been looking for

Answer 8

He ain't got a prayer.