So, for instence, if we are motivated by wealth without concern to anything else, will we live in a greed ruled world, with everything else ignored? If we are motivated by goodness, noblity, justice, common sense, humanity, compassion and truth and have the goal of a good, noble, just, sensible, humane, compassionate and true world and use good, noble, just, sensable, humane, compassionate and true means to get to it, wouldn't it actually lead to a good, noble, just, sensable, humane, compassionate and truth ruled world? Could we surmise that if the world is going in a certain direction, that it is going that way because of the motivations in the hearts and minds of the people who are making it go that way? So if our goal is a good, noble, just, sensable, humane, compassionate, true world shouldn't we have those ideals be our primary motivation, and then the actions to get there will naturally follow?
2007-03-03
03:44:05
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Stan S
1
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
If more and more people aspire towards the good and noble and honorable, which is not religon, race, sex, age or even intelligence dependent(or the current state of ones goodness, honor or nobility), wouldn't that lead to a better and better world and wouldn't having that example become more and more widespread have it spread faster and faster? And I have a feeling alot of people think they aren't good enough to aspire towards goodness or honor or any high minded noble ideals, but isn't not aspiring to that what got them in there current state of feeling unworthy? I know people can redeem themselves no matter what they've done and no matter how many times they fail or fall or stumble. Are these statements also true?
2007-03-03
04:21:33 ·
update #1
Just because mankind is naturally not inclined towards what I'm thinking of is no reason whatsoever that it shouldn't be strived for. No matter how difficult the right thing is its still the right thing, and just because something has never been done before is no reason whatsoever that it couldn't be done or shouldn't be done, right?
2007-03-03
05:04:57 ·
update #2