Steve Waugh has said that during his captaincy his team played the game hard and FAIR. What do u think?

Question

I think during his captaincy thay played hard as Aussies always do.

But certainly not FAIR, I mus say that Steve has lost my support as a fan of the game.I mean come on be honest he and his gang has sledge at every batsmen that comes into bat in every match it became a norm under his leadership and even when there were winning too.Using racist and provoking language. Why can't he just own up to that?

Everybody and Everyone who follows cricket and hav seen the Aussies play knows this.

Come on even blind and def people were in shock and awe by him and his mates ruthless way of playing the game.

Answer 1

well we all know that they played hard but i m not so sure of the 'fair' part.
but sledging cannot be called unfair, in fact it adds spice to the game (take sreesanth for example)
many of their tactics though are hard to accept.

Answer 2

So what if they are ruthless - if you dont want to be ruthless to win, you shouldnt play at all!! You have to have the burning desire to win!

I do think that they played the game hard and fair. Its not like Australia are the only country that sledge - every country does it, its just that Australia are the best at it. And unlike other countries, at least you know exactly what they are saying - not like some players who sledge in their native tongue because they dont have the guts to say it in English so that you understand.

As Steve Waugh put it, the sledging he used was "mental disintergration". Your claims that it was all racial abuse are unfounded. There was the odd occasion where a player would say the wrong thing, but more often than not, it was simply playing on something to get in a batsmans head. Here are some perfect examples:

2001 Ashes: Nasser Hussain got hit on the fingers and showed pain. The slips then loudly suggested the bowler aim for the fingers again to crack all the others.

2002/3 in SA: The team played in the over the top superstitions of Neil Mackenzie. They would joke that he had stepped on a line or missed a cue and that got him paranoid.

2003/4 v Zimbabwe: When Stuart Carlisle got to 77, his highest score, they started to get in his ear that he did not know what to do when he got past 77 and to make sure not to muck it up.

Ultimately, it shows the mental weakness of the opposition if this sort of stuff got to them. If they were stronger, they would have blocked it out and worried about their own game.

Answer 3

I dont think of Steve Waugh replaced into forced with the help of selectors to resign from captaincy. He replaced into solid captain he himself desperate to resign from captaincy. conserving retirement and resigning from captaincy it relies upon on man or woman to man or woman as Gilcrist declared retirement and he peformed the suitable in Australian component in try to cb sequence the two. This remember is of Cricket Australia and Ponting we could desire to consistently no longer entrfare of their concerns. related to Clark that's in simple terms too early to assert any subject until and until he proves himself like Ponting. one subject i could desire to assert that lots of the prasent Australian participant are on verge of retirement . in simple terms 3 gamers are youthful you could count extensive variety as Clark ,Jonson and Hopes who're bellow 30. decrease than this occasion that's extremely deficlt to assert dominance of Australian team in destiny is huge question mark.

Answer 4

He is a good captain because he made the team hard so AUS won so many times

Answer 5

I think that his remark was unwarranted as after his retirement also Australia have performed exceptioonally well.