A more correct question would have been: can they be the same?
In maths, it is more common to have inequality than equality. That is why we spend so much time analysing equalities: they are rare beasts that provide us with powerful tools.
a^2 + b^2 ?=? (a+b)^2
a^2 + b^2 ?=? (a+b)*(a+b)
a^2 + b^2 ?=? a^2 + 2ab + b^2
(take away a^2 + b^2 from both sides)
0 ?=? 2ab
True only if a=0 or b=0
Otherwise, the difference is 2*a*b (a number not equal to 0).
2007-03-03 03:02:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Raymond 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
(a + b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2 therefore unless a = 0 or b =0 the 2ab in the middle is going to be the difference.
If you mean why does the first formula work, then try drawing a square. Divide two adjacent sides in the same way unequally (if you see what I mean) and call the lengths a and b along each side
(a > b). This gives you a large square with area a^2, a small square with area b^2 and two rectangles each with area ab. These must add up to the area of the original square which is (a + b)^2.
2007-03-03 02:59:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by mathsmanretired 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
u can use a simple working to find out why:
square of the sum of 2 numbers:
(1)------ (x+y)^2 = x^2 + 2xy + y^2
sum of the squares of two numbers:
(2)------ (x)^2 + (y)^2 = x^2 + y^2
the difference is for the first equation, u haf a 2xy, which u dun haf in the 2nd equation. so (1) is not the same as (2)
2007-03-03 04:23:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The operation of squaring (or cubing etc...) is not distributive over a plus or minus sign because then the order of operations would be violated.
2007-03-03 03:04:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋