world wide capitalism and modern day slaves.
2007-03-03 02:39:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
No i do not consider that fact. -The chinese banned plastic that would want to be recycled yet what percentage trees are being chopped down for the alternative paper bags? sure you also can recycle paper bags besides the undeniable fact that i trust recycled paper has extra limitations than recycled plastic. -Kim Jung IL (or inspite of that nut jobs call is) isn't a "international warming professional" so as that factor isn't valid. -No i'm no longer keen to stay lower than a dictatorship in ANY situations, the point of democracy is that the human beings may have an opinion and outcome replace on climate replace, many scientist say that the earth is going by a organic warming era besides comparable to the cooling era contained in the 60's. -i might want to by no potential imagine there is any sturdy with authoritarian dictatorship, even if or not they are sturdy to the human beings. i imagine self-responsibility and self-actualization are significant options that would want to by no potential be executed lower than a dictatorship or autocracy.
2016-10-17 10:04:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anarchy!!! Only the bullies would be able to select leaders.
In a democracy, we would never be able to get a leader (like President Bush). We'd only be able to get puppets of the governing elite. By leading the world toward democracy (that's his description of self-determination), President Bush is pushing us toward a one-world government governed by the elitists.
Nobody really wants a democracy. A democracy is two coyotes and a chicken deciding what's for dinner.
2007-03-03 02:47:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by CJohn317 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
America would be prey to every nation with a grudge. Chinese and Indian policies would rule the world. We'd probably have a national breeding program established to beef up our rank.
http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/ipc/idbrank.pl
2007-03-03 02:53:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Michael E 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are a diverse global community. If Democrats and Republicans can't get along, could you imagine an election worldwide??
2007-03-03 02:44:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Could you imagine all the political adds.
Lets see we would need about 10, 000 congressmen and 2500 senators. We couldn't afford their wages or retirements.
2007-03-03 02:41:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by snowball45830 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The world would be a much better place, and there would be less war because no evil dictators would control power and commit genocide like Hussein.
2007-03-03 02:43:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by bigsey93bruschi54 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
It would be chaos. The power struggles would become even more violent then they are today.
2007-03-03 02:41:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Brian P 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
How would that happen? We have already seen that trying to force democracy down people's throats doesn't work.
2007-03-03 02:40:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by gemneye70 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
knowing humans ww III,seriously
2007-03-03 02:47:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by tom the plumber 3
·
1⤊
0⤋