the "inconvenient truth" is actually the inconvenient lie"....notice how the greenies have changed "global warming" to climate change"?..."global warming started in 1680, during the "little ice age"...long before co2 supposedly became a factor...the greenies do not want the folks to consider the "sun" as a factor, they do not want the sun's influence to be brought in as an argument at all...so bringing in the co2 factor somehow legitimizes their "junk science>
2007-03-03 01:12:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by bushfan88 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Disingenuous = Al Gore.
You said it all.
2007-03-03 09:56:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by TexasStar 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its for dramatic effect. It's a hollywood version of a scientific theory. The theory has merit in its base form, but when we accept it as absolute fact and have non numerical charts to "prove it", then we know we're really gone overboard.
2007-03-03 08:09:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by The_Music_Man 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Sorry ,Do not know what chart you are talking about .
I never put much stock in charts :)
2007-03-03 08:18:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Elaine814 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm so glad that the petroleum industry has questioners like this protecting their interests.
2007-03-03 08:16:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Timothy B 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
is this about gloabal warming--- well if it is you should read this: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/130207globalwarming.htm
no wonder he can't even make up a chart, it's not even real!
2007-03-03 08:36:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by erotikos_stratiotis 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think it's pretty g.d. disingenuous of him to expect us to conserve while he wastes.
2007-03-03 08:09:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Your question doesn't even make any sense.....
2007-03-03 08:20:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by lucielu 2
·
0⤊
1⤋