It seems as if George Bush is giving $millions to extreme Sunni organisations to combat Iranian Shiites. This is just the same as giving Saddam Hussien mega weapons as the US did in the 80's. Will they never learn? Are they that stupid? Osama bin Laden must be laughing all the way to nuclear bomb revenge by now.
Why has not G Bush been prosecuted for giving material aid to an enemy of the US?
"New Yorker, 25th Feb 2007"
2007-03-02 23:57:49 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
it's like the other guy said to keep the enemy strong. He also has to have a reason to to keep funneling billions to Halliburton, the company Cheney was CEO of. Also to fund the defense contractors. Bush nor any of his advisors know much about Arabs all they want is us to get the hell out of there. They are very peace loving people. The most important thing of all. Arabs want to negotiate everything. Buy any tourist book and the first thing they say is when you buy something from a shopkeeper he wants to negotiate price. The same goes for everything they do. I live with them for more than a year. All Geo Bush Sr. would have had to done with Saddam Hussien when he invaded kuiwait was negotiate with him and he would have pulled out. No one wants to be told what they have to to do. Even Osama bin Laden offered an olive leaf awhile back but we were to dam dumb to even accept it. Ever hear of forgivness. A good Christian that George is. We impeached Clinton over a oral sex. Bush should be shot for the 3000+ young men he has killed in the middle east because we went to war over weapons of mass destruction and he knew there were none. I know I got off the subject but when it comes to Bush and all the crooked republicans I could write for days. Sure is funny Flordia still hasn't fixed their voting practices.
As I am seeing right now the frickin Democrats aren't gonna do anything either. They wanted in office but once they are there they won't rock the boat. We need real lawmakers, not lawmakers aids and conslutants running the country. Do waht is right and do what is honest. Can't someone say i am sorry i made a mistake, let me correct it and move on. If we got out of the middle east I would be willing to bet that oil would drop to below $40 a barrel, evern $30
2007-03-03 00:32:03 · answer #1 · answered by Butch Paradise 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
the position they get their funding varies from human being team to team. you'll discover it may come from everywhere from simpile criminal activities alongside with armed robbery and robbing banks to the institution of seeming valid agencies. The drug commerce does grant quite truly some funding to various communities, espicially contained in the middle East and South united statesa.. only as usually inspite of the truth that, you'll see quite truly some funds are available from global fund raisers contained in the guise of non-income communities in search of funds for non violent initiatives. State funding nonetheless performs an element in some businesses, yet no longer just about to the volume it once did contained in the 70s and early 80s.
2016-12-05 04:35:54 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here is the article from USAToday about the Saudi backed Sunnis attacking coalition forces.
In fact they are causing more US deaths than Iranian backed Shiites.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2006-12-08-saudis-sunnis_x.htm
So why does Bush only point fingers at Iran????
2007-03-03 01:57:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why would anyone in politics fund crimminals?
The answer to that is look up "The Brown Shirts"
from WW2.
I beleive you could draw your own conclusions from there
2007-03-03 00:46:50 · answer #4 · answered by gotagetaweigh 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The Bush's have been aiding Bin Laden for decades, since Bush senior was president. Nothing really surprises me about the americans and the way they do things. I'm waiting for the time where something goes wrong and they end up being bitten in the butt when "fighting for a good cause" goes wrong.
2007-03-03 00:03:38 · answer #5 · answered by Lief Tanner 5 · 2⤊ 7⤋
Bush is a bastard. Doesnt he relize that whatever he is doing is not working out?
2007-03-03 02:54:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because you exist through differences
You need to keep your enemy strong to look essential against them.
It´s a question of market visibility. Without terror threat, he would simply lose a lot of his political use and his political basis.
The existence of Bin Laden makes the mediatic existence of Bush stronger and vice-versa. Both would be less visible without each other
2007-03-03 00:05:28 · answer #7 · answered by NLBNLB 6 · 4⤊ 6⤋
Hey, its a surprising fact.
If it is true, then Bush must be nuts.
2007-03-03 00:01:12 · answer #8 · answered by Gulliver 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
DENIAL. It's not just a river in Egypt. Shame on GWB, his administration, and supporters.
2007-03-03 00:26:49 · answer #9 · answered by DEMMY 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Who cares the republicans voted for him and this is in there hands, just what they needed to make some big money and not just the big oil
2007-03-03 00:13:56 · answer #10 · answered by man of ape 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋